Page MenuHomePhabricator

Add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

Add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki. We had new discussions and reached new consensus. see https://w.wiki/3snm
Per the discussion, the criteria is 90 days and 500 edits. This access is included and bundled in the bot and sysop (administrator) user groups.

Event Timeline

Bugreporter subscribed.

Per the discussion, the criteria is 90 days and 500 edits (for comparison, enwiki uses 30 days and 500 edits.)

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.

Ditto.

In T287322#7235172, @Sunny00217 wrote:

I don't think this discussion has clear consensus for add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection.

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.

May be I have too much doubt.

In T287322#7235901, @Sunny00217 wrote:
In T287322#7235172, @Sunny00217 wrote:

I don't think this discussion has clear consensus for add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection.

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.

May be I have too much doubt.

You actually misunderstood and didn't read the announcement(公示公告). see https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=66518879

On hold, policy has been rollback by DreamerBlue.

回退相關方針編輯:未見社群對擴展使用者部分有共識。

On hold, policy has been rollback by DreamerBlue.

The consensus is now obvious, but some misunderstandings need to be clarified.

The consensus is NOT obvious at all, and I even see some comments which are strong opposes. Some users ignored those comments while handling the proposal. Please DO NOT add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki until a clear consensus is formed.

The consensus is NOT obvious at all, and I even see some comments which are strong opposes. Some users ignored those comments while handling the proposal. Please DO NOT add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki until a clear consensus is formed.

Are you sure? who are strong oppose? since the new discussion is open I agree hold on until a clear consensus is formed.

The consensus is NOT obvious at all, and I even see some comments which are strong opposes. Some users ignored those comments while handling the proposal. Please DO NOT add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki until a clear consensus is formed.

Are you sure? who are strong oppose? since the new discussion is open I agree hold on until a clear consensus is formed.

At least Bookwith and Yining Chen. I hope a clearer local policy could exist under a clear consensus.

taavi changed the task status from Open to Stalled.Jul 29 2021, 8:23 AM
taavi subscribed.

Phabricator is not the place to assess consensus. Please do that on-wiki and either re-open or decline this task using Add Action...Change Status. Thanks.

The consensus is NOT obvious at all, and I even see some comments which are strong opposes. Some users ignored those comments while handling the proposal. Please DO NOT add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki until a clear consensus is formed.

Are you sure? who are strong oppose? since the new discussion is open I agree hold on until a clear consensus is formed.

At least Bookwith and Yining Chen. I hope a clearer local policy could exist under a clear consensus.

You are obviously misunderstood. The opinions of the two have been dealt with in the revised proposal, and neither of them objected to the second draft proposal.

In T287322#7245603, @Majavah wrote:

Phabricator is not the place to assess consensus. Please do that on-wiki and either re-open or decline this task using Add Action...Change Status. Thanks.

ok

after the new discussion end . we will re-open

@Majavah We had new discussions and reached consensus. see https://w.wiki/3snm

Change 712754 had a related patch set uploaded (by Zabe; author: Zabe):

[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Add extendedconfirmed on zhwiki

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/712754

In T287322#7283944, @Sunny00217 wrote:

@Zabe Your patch got a Merge Conflict.

Hi @Sunny00217, you don't need to worry about it. :)

It will be resolved before the deployment of change.

Change 712754 merged by jenkins-bot:

[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Add extendedconfirmed on zhwiki

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/712754

Change 713255 had a related patch set uploaded (by Zabe; author: Zabe):

[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Fix extendedconfirmed for bots on zhwiki

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/713255

Change 713255 merged by jenkins-bot:

[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Fix extendedconfirmed for bots on zhwiki

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/713255

Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2021-08-16T11:49:32Z] <lucaswerkmeister-wmde@deploy1002> Synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php: Config: [[gerrit:712754|Add extendedconfirmed on zhwiki (T287322)]] + Config: [[gerrit:713255|Fix extendedconfirmed for bots on zhwiki (T287322)]] (duration: 01m 01s)

Zabe claimed this task.
Zabe added a project: User-Zabe.