Change 790741 had a related patch set uploaded (by Nik Gkountas; author: Nik Gkountas):

[mediawiki/extensions/ContentTranslation@master] SX block template adaptation: Support different availability levels

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/790741

Change 790741 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/ContentTranslation@master] SX block template adaptation: Support different availability levels

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/790741

Change 792418 had a related patch set uploaded (by Santhosh; author: Santhosh):

[mediawiki/extensions/ContentTranslation@master] CX3 Build 0.2.0+20220517

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/792418

Change 792418 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/ContentTranslation@master] CX3 Build 0.2.0+20220517

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/792418

@ngkountas couple of questions here,

• In the first image the ellipsis (3 dot) is missing, should it be there? As shown in your mock above

• In the second image should there be a text message next to the icon ?

Article used for testing/translation here : PKO Bank Polski

In T304293#8031763, @EChukwukere-WMF wrote:

• In the first image the ellipsis (3 dot) is missing, should it be there? As shown in your mock above

In this case, I think the issue is in the mockup. The three dots are not expected to be shown for the template card.

• In the second image should there be a text message next to the icon ?

Good catch. The label should always show the name of the original template (i.e., the template in the source language). In this particular case, the template is missing in the target language, but the source name should still be available.

We may want to double-check that the source language name is used in all the cases (e.g., the first example showing "Distinguish" in both cases does not make it clear whether source or target is used).

To add to the second question, this is something that happens in some (relatively rare) cases, where the source templates miss a template definition. In this specific case for example, although the source template has an "about" attribute and thus is recognized as a block template by our code, it doesn't hold any template definition (no "mw" data attribute) and the source template name is not available. This is the reason why it's not displayed in the screenshot. For sure this is not desirable, but there is a lot of room for such kind of improvements in block templates, so that we can safely support all unique cases.

In T304293#8032630, @ngkountas wrote:

To add to the second question, this is something that happens in some (relatively rare) cases, where the source templates miss a template definition. In this specific case for example, although the source template has an "about" attribute and thus is recognized as a block template by our code, it doesn't hold any template definition (no "mw" data attribute) and the source template name is not available. This is the reason why it's not displayed in the screenshot. For sure this is not desirable, but there is a lot of room for such kind of improvements in block templates, so that we can safely support all unique cases.

Thanks for the added context. Based on that, this does not seem a blocker for the current task. I think that makes sense to capture this as a separate ticket. So I created T311500: Avoid template card showing an empty name when template definition is missing.
There we can discuss whether to try to get the template name in some way, or use a generic "Template" indicator.

@Pginer-WMF that being said, we can move to this to the done column and and use T311500 to address the second issue correct ?

In T304293#8035755, @EChukwukere-WMF wrote:

@Pginer-WMF that being said, we can move to this to the done column and and use T311500 to address the second issue correct ?

Yes. My only consideration is that the ticket covers 3 scenarios (No equivalent template, No parameters match, and Parameters matching). However, in the comments I only saw screenshots for two of them (No equivalent template, and Parameters matching). So I wanted to check if the three scenarios were verified.

@ngkountas is there a fast way to get to an article where one can observe No parameters match data availability? As I have checked out a lot of articles and I am yet to observe it

@Pginer-WMF I am able to get an article for the two scenarios. for the third ( No parameters match ) , its a bit different difficult to get an article with such a template. If you do have a template I can check or test with for this specific scenario I'll appreciate or I can keep checking.

In T304293#8216496, @EChukwukere-WMF wrote:

@Pginer-WMF I am able to get an article for the two scenarios. for the third ( No parameters match ) , its a bit different difficult to get an article with such a template. If you do have a template I can check or test with for this specific scenario I'll appreciate or I can keep checking.

I tried translating the Etymology section of the Tokyo article from English to Urdu in the test server. The first template of Infobox Chinese type with an equivalent in Urdu that seems to lack metadata, and parameters cannot be transferred. It seems to be rendered according to the ticket description:

Template card	Editing sentence	Editing template	Applied

@Pginer-WMF yes this is exactly what we were looking for. It also satisfies the last template. We can move this to DONE.

Thanks!