| Lydia_Pintscher | |
| Aug 2 2022, 9:19 AM |
| F35553101: ontology-1.0.owl | |
| Oct 7 2022, 1:13 PM |
| F35550476: ontology-1.0.owl | |
| Oct 6 2022, 3:37 PM |
| F35538142: ontology-1.0.owl | |
| Sep 28 2022, 3:11 PM |
| Restricted File | |
| Sep 26 2022, 3:41 PM |
| F35534698: ontology-1.0.owl | |
| Sep 26 2022, 12:45 PM |
Problem:
Our ontology definition file at http://wikiba.se/ontology is not up-to-date. We know at least about the following problems:
Acceptance criteria:
Open questions:
Change 835103 had a related patch set uploaded (by Hasan Akgün (WMDE); author: Hasan Akgün (WMDE)):
[mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLexeme@master] Add lexeme language to ontology.owl
Change 835104 had a related patch set uploaded (by Hasan Akgün (WMDE); author: Hasan Akgün (WMDE)):
[mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase@master] Add MusicalNotation to ontology file
We have talked about "Lexemes having spelling variant" with @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE and I suppose forms have spelling variants instead of lexemes and I'm not sure if it's relatable anymore. Other than that, it should be ready for review.
I have added the final form of ontology file as attachment, I don't know where to add it tbh :)
As discussed on gerrit, there is an uncertainty about lexemes having languages and the way we define them, or should we define them at all.
It'd be great if we have more comments on this issue :) @Lydia_Pintscher
To elaborate a bit: I’m not convinced we should include the dct:language predicate (property) in our ontology file, and it might be intentional that it’s not included yet – for the same reason that we don’t include e.g. rdfs:label or prov:wasDerivedFrom in our ontology file: they’re not “our” predicates. But I’m not very familiar with OWL, so I’m not sure if this reasoning makes sense or not.
You may want to check https://oops.linkeddata.es. It won't tell you about all the possible issues, but it will give you an idea of some (so-called) common pitfalls that still need to be resolved. By doing so you may also be solving T210337. 0:-)
You can visualize the result at https://service.tib.eu/webvowl/#iri=http://wikiba.se/ontology-1.0.owl or http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl-old/webvowl-old.html#iri=http://wikiba.se/ontology-1.0.owl.
Copying here for the near or distant future:
P40 (critical): Namespace hijacking. It refers to reusing or referring to terms from another namespace that are not defined in such namespace. This is an undesirable situation as no information can be retrieved when looking up those undefined terms. See TripleChecker.
P11 (important): Missing domain or range in properties. Object and/or datatype properties without domain or range (or none of them) are included in the ontology.
P04 (minor): Creating unconnected ontology elements. Ontology elements (classes, object properties and datatype properties) are created isolated, with no relation to the rest of the ontology. Solving this pitfall may lead to new results for other pitfalls and suggestions.
File:
Change 835104 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase@master] Add MusicalNotation to ontology file
Here is the final form of the merged ontology file @Lydia_Pintscher @danshick-wmde, I don't know how to update current one that's why I'm adding it to here.
LGTM; here’s the diff if anyone is curious:
diff --git a/ontology-wikibase.owl b/ontology-hasan.owl index c0b784aa70..436afcaa4e 100644 --- a/ontology-wikibase.owl +++ b/ontology-hasan.owl @@ -226,6 +226,12 @@ <rdf:type rdf:resource="&wikibase;PropertyType"/> </owl:NamedIndividual> + <owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="&wikibase;MusicalNotation"> + <rdfs:label>MusicalNotation</rdfs:label> + <rdfs:comment>Type for storing musical scores written in LilyPond notation as supported by the Score extension.</rdfs:comment> + <rdf:type rdf:resource="&wikibase;PropertyType"/> + </owl:NamedIndividual> + <!-- /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // @@ -449,6 +455,12 @@ <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="&wikibase;Entity"/> </owl:Class> + <owl:Class rdf:about="&wikibase;Sense"> + <rdfs:label>Sense</rdfs:label> + <rdfs:comment>Wikibase sense.</rdfs:comment> + <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="&wikibase;Entity"/> + </owl:Class> + <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&wikibase;lexicalCategory"> <rdfs:label>lexicalCategory</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>Lexeme lexical category.</rdfs:comment>
I can’t think of any other Wikibase predicate that we’re missing; the non-Wikibase predicates, especially the dct: ones for lexemes, should be left out of our OWL file, we decided above.
As noted above, so long as the ontology file is linked via the domain wikiba.se, updates to the file need to be given to those who manage that site, currently MOR working for KOM.
@Kris_Litson_WMDE or someone with similar powers will need to hand this off to the team that admins wikiba.se .
I've sent this off to MOR to update. I've also asked them if we they know how we can do it ourselves in future. Process discussions are in progress.
Change 835103 abandoned by Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE):
[mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLexeme@master] Add lexeme language to ontology.owl
Reason:
Moving this to done for the dev team but keeping it open so we can sort out the process.