Steps to replicate the issue (include links if applicable):
- I'm a novice user, but I'm getting more familiar with stuff...
- I use link suggestions which point me to https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=REC_Solar
- I get a suggestion to link "USA" (amongst other 3 links).
What happens?:
I was only able to add 3 links, nothing else.
https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=REC_Solar&diff=70950940&oldid=66713220
If I switch to edit mode, I lose the links. There is no mode in which I can add more links. This is wrong.
I have a suggestion to link 'USA' and clearly similar 'Europe' which I want to add, but I cannot. This is a waste. It doesn't teach me how to link properly. Instead, it suggests that there is some limit I shouldn't exceed for some reason, while, in fact, I believe we should be linking more similar things around. There is no easy path for doing so.
I understand that this limitation might have made sense initially, as it reduced human interference (when the edit is reverted, only the bot's suggestions are reverted). However, I don't think it makes sense now. Humans should be put in the center now.
What should have happened instead?:
I should be able to add more links while I'm doing this task. Example of more links added:
https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=REC_Solar&diff=next&oldid=70950940
When done with the links, it should maybe ask, 'Do you want to make more changes to this article?'. If so, it should switch to either the full Visual Editor (VE) or a simplified VE (with fewer buttons, perhaps). Something like in the Discussion tools.
Additionally, when I explicitly switch to VE, my changes should be preserved. Currently, they are not being preserved.
Software version (skip for WMF-hosted wikis like Wikipedia):
Other information (browser name/version, screenshots, etc.):
Feature description:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Growth/Personalized_first_day/Structured_tasks/Add_a_link
Switching to VE (current GUI):
Current switch dialog (should have an option to keep my machine-in-the-loop edits)
BTW, I'm also not sure if training algorithms on novice users is a good idea. How would they know if a link should be there? Training AI on novice users might reflect how newcomers think, rather than how a certain community thinks the links should look like. I'm unsure if that was the intention. Novice users often think outside of the community rules, and those rules might feel rigid and difficult to change at times. So, I can understand if the intention was to explore what novice users think. Just not sure if it is a good idea.