Description
Details
| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VE: Simplify auto-citation copy | mediawiki/extensions/Citoid | master | +2 -2 |
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T265163 Create a system to encode best practices into editing experiences | |||
| Open | None | T276857 [Check] Offer volunteers feedback about the reliability of the source they are attempting to add | |||
| Open | None | T351779 [MILESTONE] Offer Reference Reliability Check at partner wikis | |||
| Resolved | Ryasmeen | T352134 Build reference reliability check MVP (mobile + desktop) | |||
| Resolved | Esanders | T354846 Citoid: Improve copy in 'auto' panel |
Event Timeline
It's less acronym salad, so that's good. I worry about the ambiguity of "other", though. It also eliminates the "full citation" though that's less useful now that we only have crossref and no longer have worldcat for book citations.
Is a ? tooltip an option if people want the full list of options?
Is a ? tooltip an option if people want the full list of options?
It would certainly be technically possible.
Change 992896 had a related patch set uploaded (by Esanders; author: Esanders):
[mediawiki/extensions/Citoid@master] VE: Simplify auto-citation copy
I changed "Insert" to "Enter" as that seems more natural to me for populating a text field, but otherwise this is as defined in the Figma:
Change 992896 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/Citoid@master] VE: Simplify auto-citation copy