Note for devs:
For changing the project's gadget configuration it probably makes sense to temporarily request global interface admin status for a few days around Feb 14th.

Doing changes without asking the communities purely because they don’t have a lot of intadmins is, frankly, not justified at all. Hopefully wikis listed voice their clear opposition to this planned switch.

In T355312#9503772, @stjn wrote:

Doing changes without asking the communities purely because they don’t have a lot of intadmins is, frankly, not justified at all. Hopefully wikis listed voice their clear opposition to this planned switch.

This topic was also discussed here on Meta. Adding the link for transparency.

I have removed default in most GSwikis, in [[ https://lo.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%BA%A1%E0%BA%B5%E0%BB%80%E0%BA%94%E0%BA%8D%E0%BA%A7%E0%BA%B4%E0%BA%81%E0%BA%B4%3AGadgets-definition&diff=106574&oldid=105014 | LoWiki ]]the gadget was only in the gadget definition, but did not exist, here I have removed all bad gadgets completely.

In T355312#9548312, @WikiBayer wrote:

I have removed default in most GSwikis, in [[ https://lo.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%BA%A1%E0%BA%B5%E0%BB%80%E0%BA%94%E0%BA%8D%E0%BA%A7%E0%BA%B4%E0%BA%81%E0%BA%B4%3AGadgets-definition&diff=106574&oldid=105014 | LoWiki ]]the gadget was only in the gadget definition, but did not exist, here I have removed all bad gadgets completely.

Thanks a lot @WikiBayer! As noted on the discussion we updated the list so that there are only GSwikis included now. So if you find the time it would be great if you could continue helping out by removing the default flag there as well. :-)

I did some more (example) and can do the other ones later. Please note that bswiki is not a GS wiki.

Looks like these are all done now?

yes

Thanks a lot everybody!