As an editor I want important entities ranked higher in my search even if their label and alias number is reduced by the use of the mul language code
Problem:
We are rolling out the new mul language code. For details see T285156. This will help significantly reduce the number of labels and aliases in Wikidata and by extension reduce the amount of data in the Wikidata Query Service.
One side-effect of removing a lot of labels from an Item is that they drop in the ranking in search compared to Items that have more labels.
We do want to encourage more use of the mul language code, so we should probably adapt the ranking to take into account that important Items might have only few labels now.
Screenshots:
A search for Douglas Adams after many labels have been removed from Q42.
Acceptance criteria:
- Search result ranking is not significantly made worse by collapsing a lot of labels of an Item into one with the mul language code.
Open questions:
- Should we generally decrease the importance of the number of labels for ranking or do something special for mul?