For the person implementing it: This is the arab beta features page showing the existing right-to-left icons

For entertainment:

Logo_for_the_beta_feature_FileExporter_rtl.svg7 KBDownload

Oh, the colors in this image are not entirely correct. Bonus points for flipping the mountain!

In T200018#5200822, @thiemowmde wrote:

Oh, the colors in this image are not entirely correct. Bonus points for flipping the mountain!

Interesting--there's a rogue layer, comparing https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Logo_for_the_beta_feature_FileExporter.svg I see two blue mountains, but in the PNG preview https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_for_the_beta_feature_FileExporter.svg I see one gray and one blue.

It wasn't a layer. It was just.... something weird. This should be the fix, thanks for catching!

I'm confused now. So what is correct? The image with two blue mountains or the image with one grey and one blue mountain? :-D

So it seems that in the events in T175549: Use new beta feature logo in FileExporter this went from grey and blue to blue and blue - without being noticed. @Jan_Dittrich any opinions on that?

Fun fact:
The rendered preview png on this page shows grey&blue https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_for_the_beta_feature_FileExporter.svg
The original svg file rendered in my FF browser shows blue&blue https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Logo_for_the_beta_feature_FileExporter.svg

Uh. The SVG file contains a <style> element at the top. That contains instructions to colorize certain elements. This is only respected if you display the file in a browser. The style rules do have a higher precedence then. An SVG editor like Inkscape ignores it.

In T200018#5207536, @WMDE-Fisch wrote:

So it seems that in the events in T175549: Use new beta feature logo in FileExporter this went from grey and blue to blue and blue - without being noticed. @Jan_Dittrich any opinions on that?

After a quick talk to @Jan_Dittrich : blue & grey is slightly preferred, if the grey is in the existing color schema. But blue & blue is also ok if things turn out to get complicated.

Change 512168 had a related patch set uploaded (by WMDE-Fisch; owner: WMDE-Fisch):
[mediawiki/extensions/FileExporter@master] Add BetaFeature image for RTL wikis

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/512168

FYI: The darker gray is on the https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_color_formatting_help#WikimediaUI_color_palette_(M82) - using the grey to blue version now. :-).

Change 512168 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/FileExporter@master] Add BetaFeature image for RTL wikis

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/512168

I don't know how to check this apart from waiting until the train ran through and then checking the live beta pages

In T200018#5214634, @Lea_WMDE wrote:

I don't know how to check this apart from waiting until the train ran through and then checking the live beta pages

Good point. Hmmm...

You could at least start with this :-)
https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-FileExporter/blob/master/resources/FileExporter-beta-features-ltr.svg
https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-FileExporter/blob/master/resources/FileExporter-beta-features-rtl.svg

And when the train ran tomorrow this should also work:
https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences?uselang=he#mw-prefsection-betafeatures

In T200018#5214634, @Lea_WMDE wrote:

I don't know how to check this apart from waiting until the train ran through and then checking the live beta pages

A technical question about this: beta cluster wikis (not test.wmo) should update as soon as the patch is merged to the master branch. If that's not happening for us, something need fixing...

In T200018#5229580, @awight wrote:

In T200018#5214634, @Lea_WMDE wrote:

I don't know how to check this apart from waiting until the train ran through and then checking the live beta pages

A technical question about this: beta cluster wikis (not test.wmo) should update as soon as the patch is merged to the master branch. If that's not happening for us, something need fixing...

No there's everything fine with beta. The reasons why this could not be tested on beta properly is, that we do not have the extension deployed as a beta feature there, but as a default feature.