Inactive account starting 15th of August 2024
User Details
- User Since
- Jan 2 2023, 3:49 PM (162 w, 5 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Frederik Ring
- MediaWiki User
- Unknown
Aug 14 2024
Aug 13 2024
Pull Request https://github.com/wbstack/ui/pull/849
Aug 12 2024
Relevant PromQL queries for this are:
It's been decided we don't do this, see discussion in the now closed PR.
Aug 6 2024
Aug 5 2024
The why is mostly to cover for extending the tests to also cover the "meat" of the application: wiki management. If we say main and discovery page are all we ever want to cover, it's probably not needed.
Jul 31 2024
Jul 30 2024
Jul 24 2024
Jul 23 2024
Pull Request https://github.com/wbstack/api/pull/847
Pull Request: https://github.com/wbstack/transferbot/pull/5
Jul 22 2024
Pull Request: https://github.com/wbstack/api/pull/830
Pull Request https://github.com/wbstack/ui/pull/826
Jul 16 2024
Jul 9 2024
Jul 8 2024
Does it matter?
Jul 4 2024
Pull Request: https://github.com/wbstack/transferbot/pull/3/files
Jul 3 2024
Pull Request https://github.com/wbstack/api/pull/830
Jul 2 2024
Pull Request: https://github.com/wbstack/mediawiki/pull/447
Jun 27 2024
Pull Request https://github.com/wbstack/api/pull/823
Jun 26 2024
Jun 20 2024
Jun 18 2024
Jun 17 2024
Pull Request https://github.com/wbstack/api/pull/814
Jun 11 2024
If you manually walk up the possible ids, you will hit a revision at some point, so the bug is that relying on revision 1 to be always present is not working as intended.
I'm not sure why that is, but it seems those wikis do not have any revision objects at all, e.g. https://monacan.wikibase.cloud/w/api.php?action=query&format=json&prop=revisions which means our approach of getting revision 1 and picking its date fails. The wiki also has no deleted revisions.
PR for ingress-nginx: https://github.com/wmde/wbaas-deploy/pull/1638
Jun 10 2024
PR for the Platform error page in MediaWiki https://github.com/wbstack/mediawiki/pull/442
Jun 6 2024
PR for UI https://github.com/wbstack/ui/pull/822
Jun 5 2024
Case 3 also passes for me using
Could you maybe provide a full "as-is" input that you are trying to process? I just tried reproducing case 2 again and it worked as expected (adding both statements) for me using
Pull Request: https://github.com/wmde/wbaas-deploy/pull/1633
Jun 4 2024
the present situation is fine because the main issue was the batch being stuck
Pull Request https://github.com/wmde/wbaas-deploy/pull/1632
