In T416673#11593804, @Stitipragyan_barik wrote:

@Xqt am i change other related file also?

Waiting for wiki is created.

Hi @JJMC89, I noticed you dislike this task. This also affects T416145. Since I really value your technical judgement, I’d like to understand your concerns better. Could you share what you think is problematic about it.

Hi @JJMC89, I noticed you dislike this task. Since I really value your technical judgement, I’d like to understand your concerns better. Could you share what you think is problematic about it. This also affects T416566.

You have to upload your change. There is just PS1.

@NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA, Great, the family is well, thank you. But the addwikis part is not related to this task, probably added by accident due to a new release from source. Could you remove it please.

@Aklapper:A strange problem that I assume arises somewhere upstream or somehow with SSE. It wasn't reported to me for a longer time but I am still unsure whether it is really solved somehow. Therefor I keep it still open for a while.

In T415976#11588288, @NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA wrote:

Hi @Xqt,

Thanks for checking.

I reverted my local changes for T415976 and ran the addwikis tool as suggested:
python pwb.py addwikis -family:wikisource ur

The tool reports that 'ur' is already present in the wikisource family and that
there are no wikis to add, so it does not generate any changes.

I am not actively working on T415976 anymore. Please let me know if you would
like me to take any further action there, or if the task can be considered
complete from my side.

Hi @NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA, please use the related task for communication. It is difficult if threads are spreaded over several tasks.

In T416145#11589188, @Stitipragyan_barik wrote:

@Xqt can you give advice which issue to work on next , seems no good-first-issue open in pywikibot.

In T416145#11590789, @NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA wrote:

Please let me know which task you’d recommend I pick up next, and I’ll proceed step by step.

@NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA: your patch is not completed and this task is still an issue. If you run addwikis locally, it compares the local file, not the repository. Pleas adjust the lines of your commit. Or restet you local changes and run the addwikis script.

Thank you for tagging this task with good first task for Wikimedia newcomers!

In T415976#11588288, @NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA wrote:

Hi @Xqt
Awaiting feedback.

There is another thing when removing the future import:

In T414239#11587723, @Roshani005 wrote:

I’ve pushed the change to Gerrit for review:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/pywikibot/core/+/1237240

You plan looks good. Another idea would be to remove the from __future__ import annotations line. In that case, you get the classes directly without parsing. For example:

@Roshani005: what was your command line to run addwikis? You should see this message:

Test is already skipped for GraalPy

@Stitipragyan_barik: Thank you for your last patch. It will be merged into the repository now. The result should be visible in the interwiki script documentation in about half an hour. Some remarks:

• If you are working on patches, you should amend the previous patch when making changes instead of pushing a new patch every time. I will abandon the remaining ones now.
• You may add yourself to the AUTHORS.rst file.

In T416116#11587402, @anoexpected wrote:

Thanks @Xqt! I missed that the documentation update was required here. I will update the module docstring in interwiki.py to include the -graph parameter description and submit a patch shortly.

@Roshani005: please add yourself to "Assign / Claim" if you want to work on it.

Hi @Roshani005, NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA has already announced in T416116 to work on this but you can work on T414239 which is quite similar.

The related issue (add -graph to interwiki documentation) is still open.

In T416116#11587028, @gerritbot wrote:

Change #1237162 merged by jenkins-bot:

[pywikibot/core@master] Refactor: Decouple interwiki.py from global config.interwiki_graph

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1237162

NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA: I made a comment in the other task. There are also two easy task for beginners (T415976 and T414239). All to do there is to run a script with the right options.

@NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA: Just follow the steps listed above. But first, make sure you are familiar with the initial steps in the "Further Help" section — in particular, T407059 is very helpful.

Thank you for tagging this task with good first task for Wikimedia newcomers!

good first task
addwikis script can be used to add the wiki easily. The patch will be submitted after the wiki is really created.

Thank you for tagging this task with good first task for Wikimedia newcomers!

good first task
addwikis script can be used to add the wiki easily. The patch will be submitted after the wiki is really created.

In T416116#11586545, @NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA wrote:

Since this task is already being handled, I’m happy to support in any way needed or take up another related task. Please let me know how I can contribute.

Maybe T416566 is for beginners, but not so quite simple. I would lead you.

Thank you for tagging this task with good first task for Wikimedia newcomers!

@NAGAM_SURYA_NARAYANA: patches are already submitted by @Ayushii.sr and @Stitipragyan_barik but both does not solve this issue. Script options are always documented inside the script itself that it can be shown with the global -help option. For reference, see the interwiki script.

In T416116#11585950, @anoexpected wrote:

I have updated the patch so that InterwikiBotConfig.graph initializes with config.interwiki_graph. This ensures user-config.py settings are respected as the default, while still allowing the -graph argument to override it locally.

@anoexpected: good idea to have a local variable (attribute) but keep in mind that the config setting is the default and can be overridden by -graph option.

Hi @Bharathvk1889 and @VishakhaSahu05, you can both work on this task. However, please make sure to coordinate and announce in advance which test files you intend to work on. Please also see the description in the introduction.

Thank you for tagging this task with good first task for Wikimedia newcomers!

Hi @Bharathvk1889: I think you can work on it but I am unsure whether this is a "good first task".

Hi @Bharathvk1889, sure, there are still some remaining issues that you can work on. Please don’t try to fix them all in a single patch — split them, for example, by test file, as it’s easier to review smaller parts. I also recommend installing pre-commit and running the tool before submitting the patch. Please note that the repository is on Gerrit, not GitHub.

I think the crossnamespace attribute has to be implemented as follows in your family file:

We could implement an option or an easier crossnamespace setting to ignore namespace mismatch if this is appropriate for that wiki.

The namespace mismatch can be solved by a cossnamespace attribute in your family file (see the example in the linked documentation). The previous wikipedia/wikisource usage can be seen in rPWBC77d1546.

In T416086#11573208, @Ivan-r wrote:

This does not explain why, if there is a conflict between pages in the same namespace and/or non-disambiguation pages, the script draws the graph.

@AtharvaKathe: I don't see the problem with the current implementation except that the Error messages shown are unclear. Could you explain a bit more or show the error message you got. I would expect

• ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '<literal>' or
• ValueError: time data '<literal>' does not match MW format