I'd say this might be https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112751 too? (private security ticket) Those with access, please check.

i am the sysop who were blocked wrongly in this issue. i still use wikipedia education program namespace because professors at my university (the hashemite university where i am leader to education program) are more familiar with namespace than the Dashboard although the later is more developed i still in need to use the namespace to continue the education program at my university. regards

I will send a note to the functionaries list about this, as until it is fixed seems like it is important for all CU to be aware of this.

In T181889#3805855, @Doc_James wrote:

I will send a note to the functionaries list about this, as until it is fixed seems like it is important for all CU to be aware of this.

Thanks. Sure it is importat to take in in consideration

I learned about this thanks to the note posted on CU-l. Can someone please add me to T112751 so I can start working on a patch?

Done

Thanks. From what I see so far, I do *not* think that the issue here is the same as T112751. I will investigate the issue more.

In T181889#3805727, @MarcoAurelio wrote:

I'd say this might be https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112751 too? (private security ticket) Those with access, please check.

@MarcoAurelio can you please add me to the private ticket. Thx.

In T181889#3966731, @Billinghurst wrote:

@MarcoAurelio can you please add me to the private ticket. Thx.

No. Because Bawolff already added you :)

With this component it looks as though removing oneself, or removing someone else both utilise the same message.

https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/EEDU/browse/master/i18n/en.json$78

"logentry-eparticle-review": "$1 added {{GENDER:$2|himself|herself|themself}} as reviewer to article $3 {{GENDER:$6|worked upon by}} $5 as part of course $4",
"logentry-eparticle-unreview": "$1 removed {{GENDER:$2|himself|herself|themself}} as reviewer to article $3 {{GENDER:$6|worked upon by}} $5 as part of course $4",

Now I may be misreading this stuff as it is not my strength, however, I couldn't identify removal of another party in the messaging.

It doesn't explain the checkuser interaction with the extension, though that is difficult without seeing the life data to know whose information is being incorrectly returned. Presuming the queries are working correctly, then it would be the data put into the wrong spots. Presumably that will require something with backend access to the data to make that determination. You would think that it is more likely that the wrong data is being pushed into the logs.

There is now a ticket to remove the extension here. It will be removed from all wikimedia projects in 30 June. Regards