@Lydia_Pintscher there is a suspicion that this maybe a consequence of the RL Module improvement. It is however one of the gadgets that was not checked, because it is used by less than 400 users. Please check whether we want to prioritise this at this point.

@Lea_Lacroix_WMDE about the piece of communication we talked about, regarding guidelines and successes of the RL Module Terminators: for the sake of clarification it might be needed to mention the gadgets that were checked and why those.

Thanks for creating the ticket 👍

What are the possible options here? Should the gadget author update something in the code?

In T238479#5669033, @Lea_Lacroix_WMDE wrote:

Thanks for creating the ticket 👍

What are the possible options here? Should the gadget author update something in the code?

Firstly we would need to gather more information about the error to assess that. Let me ping @Jakob_WMDE , @Ladsgroup and @Rosalie_WMDE for that, since they are the RL Module Terminator Team. They will surely have a more educated answer.

I will also ping @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE , since he replied to the email on the mailing list.

@MichaelSchoenitzer because this also affects his tool.

@Mvolz, I miss your version of CiteTool.

Adapting what Lucas wrote on the mailing list for User:MichaelSchoenitzer/CiteTool.js, replacing

mw.loader.using(['wikibase'], function() {

when loading it in your common.js with

mw.loader.using(['wikibase', 'wikibase.datamodel']).then(function (require) {
	var datamodel = require( 'wikibase.datamodel' );
	wb.datamodel = datamodel;

seems to make it work again by putting the variable back where it was before. I don't know why it was moved so I don't know if it will have some unexpected side effects.

It doesn't work for User:Mvolz_(WMF)/CiteTool.js though, that's producing some other errors that need fixing as well.

I tried the fix Nikki suggested above and it worked for me! Nice to have this tool back.