MediaWiki should support NoSQL
Version: 1.4.x
Severity: blocker
OS: Mac System 9.x
Platform: Macintosh
Description
Description
Details
Details
- Reference
- bz30559
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | None | T31079 RESOLVED HUMOROUS (TRACKING) | |||
| Declined | None | T32561 MediaWiki isn't webscale | |||
| Declined | None | T32559 NoSQL Support |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
(In reply to comment #1)
we have memcached.
Does memcached provide a permanent store?
Comment Actions
Per http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/1016320617/mongodb-is-web-scale we should aim for /dev/null instead.
Comment Actions
(In reply to comment #6)
Per http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/1016320617/mongodb-is-web-scale we should
aim for /dev/null instead.
Why not just support the BLACKHOLE storage engine ( http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/blackhole-storage-engine.html ) in MySQL ? Is MongoDB more efficient at storing no data ?
What about /dev/null ? Is it better or worse than MongoDB ?
If it is, I support this featreq.