Hello @gonyeahialam! Perhaps you can explore how we can do this and then share the design idea with the team? Thanks in advance!

In T365859#9830789, @ifried wrote:

Hello @gonyeahialam! Perhaps you can explore how we can do this and then share the design idea with the team? Thanks in advance!

I am working on it.

Thank you, @gonyeahialam! Could you perhaps share the concepts at the next design + engineering meeting?

To make all information about dates clear, I have made a few changes:

1. I emphasized the dates on the events. The dates are the next most important information after the event title and need to be seen at a glance.
2. I highlighted the change in month and year by adding the year beside the month and inserting a divider. This clarifies the year an event starts and when there is a transition between years in the list. For example, in the current list, you might see December, January, May, and September without realizing some months are in different years. This change, along with the previous one, will make this clear. It will also make ongoing events more noticeable at a glance (even though people can choose whether to see ongoing events or not, it will be helpful to easily differentiate them on the list when they appear together).
3. I added a filter for users to choose whether they want to see ongoing events.

Uses a checkbox to toggle between showing ongoing events	Uses a dropdown

I am exploring more ideas to make this clearer but the above are the current main ideas

cc @MHorsey-WMF @Daimona @cmelo @VPuffetMichel @ifried

In T365859#9856073, @gonyeahialam wrote:

To make all information about dates clear, I have made a few changes: [...]

LGTM. I personally prefer the option with the checkbox, since it's just one option. I'm also not 100% convinced by the checkbox label, but at this time I don't have ideas on how to improve it.

Looks good to me too.

Thanks for sharing the thinking behind the changes you made. @gonyeahialam

As far as the label of the checkbox, could we do something like:

• Show events that already started and are ongoing

Hi @gonyeahialam! Thank you for sharing your thinking behind the suggested changes. It is very helpful to read it :) A few small comments & questions:

• When you say that the dates are more emphasized in the new version, you mean that they are now in bold, correct? If yes, I think this makes it easier to quickly skim the event list to find this event start & end dates, so this change makes sense to me.
• I like that you included the year. My only suggested tweak is to remove the comma. So it would be, for example, "January 2023" and not "January, 2023"
• I also like that you are experimenting with ways to make the separation of the months more clear. A separating line is a way to do this.
• I prefer the checkbox rather than the dropdown as well, since there are 2 only options (so a dropdown feels unnecessary). Do you agree, or no?
• Regarding language for the checkbox, I like what @VPuffetMichel wrote: "Show events that already started and are ongoing." What do you think? If you agree, perhaps we can update the text and go with the checkbox example for the ticket?

@Daimona @VPuffetMichel @ifried

For the dropdown, I was exploring the scenario where there are more options like: Ongoing, Upcoming, Past, Closed, Ended events.

Thanks for the copy suggestions, I am still exploring the clearest copy. We can go with @VPuffetMichel copy

In T365859#9861681, @ifried wrote:

Hi @gonyeahialam! Thank you for sharing your thinking behind the suggested changes. It is very helpful to read it :) A few small comments & questions:

• When you say that the dates are more emphasized in the new version, you mean that they are now in bold, correct? If yes, I think this makes it easier to quickly skim the event list to find this event start & end dates, so this change makes sense to me.
• I like that you included the year. My only suggested tweak is to remove the comma. So it would be, for example, "January 2023" and not "January, 2023"
• I also like that you are experimenting with ways to make the separation of the months more clear. A separating line is a way to do this.
• I prefer the checkbox rather than the dropdown as well, since there are 2 only options (so a dropdown feels unnecessary). Do you agree, or no?
• Regarding language for the checkbox, I like what @VPuffetMichel wrote: "Show events that already started and are ongoing." What do you think? If you agree, perhaps we can update the text and go with the checkbox example for the ticket?

I agree with the above.
I have explained the idea behind the drop-down above.

A better phrasing will be to use 'include' instead of 'show'

• Include events that already started and are ongoing.

@MHorsey-WMF @Daimona How do we currently handle ongoing events with closed registration? Do we still show them in the list?

In T365859#9863006, @gonyeahialam wrote:

@MHorsey-WMF @Daimona How do we currently handle ongoing events with closed registration? Do we still show them in the list?

Yes.

We discussed this in a team meeting today. We should continue to display all events (open, closed, and finished). However, we can improve this user experience in the future to allow users to select what they want to see (see T366741). This work is lower priority and should be handled separately. Our high priority work right now is to allow users to display/hide ongoing events, since the current user experience is confusing to some people. Also, I still think the checkbox makes the most sense since an event can be ongoing but "open" or "closed," so all of those things would not easily fit into a dropdown in which only one option can be selected.

In that case, @gonyeahialam, let's update the ticket with the latest designs and then we can share it with the engineers for a final look. As for the updated language change to be "Include" rather than "Show," that works for me. If we want to change the UX later, we certainly can, but I think this is a good solution to the problem we have at hand. Thanks!

latest design

Changes:
The date is now bold
The year has been added to the month heading with a divider underneath
A check box below the From and To filters to include or exclude ongoing events

@cmelo @ifried @VPuffetMichel @Daimona @MHorsey-WMF Done with the design

Hi @gonyeahialam! The text in the design example is incorrect. It should be: "Include events that already started and are ongoing." In your example, it reads: "Include already started events that are ongoing." Can this be updated? Thanks!

Updated

Note: The label doesn't have a full-stop

Yup, the full stop was just for the sentence of my comment, but you are correct that the actual label should not have it. Thank you, @gonyeahialam!

• Show events that already started and are ongoing

I was re-reading this task, but noticed that either the copy is inaccurate, or I don't understand what we're doing here. Sorry for not noticing this before. I'm going to explain with two examples.

First, suppose we have an event that runs from June 1 to June 31. When you open the AllEvents page, the "From" date is set to June 11 (today). If "ongoing events" are shown, that event would be in the list. If you choose to hide ongoing events, that event is no longer shown. I think we all agree up until here.

Second, suppose you have an event running from September 1 to September 30. After you open the AllEvents page, you change the "From" date to September 10. That event would appear in the list. But, if you choose to hide "ongoing" events, that event should become hidden, is this correct? If so, the checkbox label is incorrect, because the event in question hasn't already started (it'll start in 3 months) and is not ongoing. You'd get a similarly confusing behaviour if you set the "From" date to, say, January 10, and you had an event from Jan 1 to Jan 31.

Now I understand why the prototype in T365859#9856073 had a more verbose label. Should we actually use that, or a variant of it that more faithfully represents the reality of things? I feel like this whole "From - To" thing is already quite confusing, so I'd like the label to be correct, at least.

Some options are:

Clearer but long

• Include events that started before and are happening within the selected date range

Shorter version

• Include events continuing into date range

Somes notes:

• We should display ongoing events as default. This was confirmed after talking to @gonyeahialam. We both believe that it is better to show ongoing events because, if we do not, there are many events that people could join, but they would be hidden from them. Perhaps this is not how users will feel, but we can start this way and see what feedback we get.
• As for language, thanks for clarifying that "ongoing" alone is not sufficient, @Daimona. Also, thanks for asking bigger picture questions about what should or should not happen in terms of behavior. For this reason, I have listed what I see as the main use cases below (in the next bullet point). Meanwhile, I appreciate the new language options you shared, @gonyeahialam! They are more accurate. I have a slightly tweaked version of your last example, but it is pretty similar to what you came up with: "Include ongoing events within the date range."
• I took a step back and broke down when/why people may want to use this feature, just so we can have more clarity. Here is how I break it down:
  • For events that have ended: Users may want to know which events were active during a given time period in the past. For example, "I want to see all of the events that were happening in March 2023, regardless of when they started." We already do this: see Wletg2023 in this example
  • For current events: Users may want to know which events they can join/attend, even if the events have already started. I think this would be especially useful for longer online events and content drives, in which people can jump in at various times and join the event. This is the most common use case that I think we can all agree on.
  • For upcoming events (this is the September example that was provided above): Users may want to know about all events going on during a future time period. For example, maybe an organizer wants to organize an event during that period, and they want to know all of the other events that are going on, so they can limit any clashes with other events. We already do this: see Desafío Uruguay in this example.

Overall, what do people think? Do we think this works?: Include ongoing events within the date range

In T365859#9886466, @ifried wrote:

Overall, what do people think? Do we think this works?: Include ongoing events within the date range

Neat!