Author: avarab
Description:
The logging table needs a log_user_text field so that events from unloggedin
users can be logge.
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
Author: avarab
Description:
The logging table needs a log_user_text field so that events from unloggedin
users can be logge.
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
rotemliss wrote:
It seems that this field should be filled when running update.php, and it should
be changed when the Renameuser extension changes someone's user name.
(In reply to comment #4)
Removed 'schema-change' keyword. No patch attached that requires a schema
change.
Adding back. Although there is no patch, the bug explicitly asks for a schema change. See also the description of the schema-change keyword.
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Removed 'schema-change' keyword. No patch attached that requires a schema
change.Adding back. Although there is no patch, the bug explicitly asks for a schema
change. See also the description of the schema-change keyword.
Makes for a useless search on this keyword, then. Unless it is combined with "patch" and "need-review" keywords. At the moment 21 issues have keyword "schema-change".
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Removed 'schema-change' keyword. No patch attached that requires a schema
change.Adding back. Although there is no patch, the bug explicitly asks for a schema
change. See also the description of the schema-change keyword.Makes for a useless search on this keyword, then. Unless it is combined with
"patch" and "need-review" keywords. At the moment 21 issues have keyword
"schema-change".
Yeah, I guess that's true.
php importTextFile.php's user=Maintenance_script will show up in
RecentChanges, but like Bug #17343, when one checks (the security
cameras at) Special:Log, it's like (the bandits took out the film) "I
didn't see anything, did you?". Also users are shown plenty of
worthless links in RecentChanges to "Maintenance script (Talk |block)
(Importing text file)".
I wonder what putting
+---------+--------------+
user_id | user_name |
+---------+--------------+
0 | Default User |
+---------+--------------+
into the user table would do, at least for Bug #17343.