User Details
- User Since
- Mar 19 2015, 8:05 AM (527 w, 4 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- Gunnex [ Global Accounts ]
Aug 20 2016
Aug 13 2016
Aug 11 2016
"What do you mean by "summaries of filters"?" Sorry for my misleading comment. I mean the summaries (or upload comments) in the uploads using different upload tools (see above), like (example) "Cross-wiki upload from en.wikipedia.org" which is stored in the mediawiki-table "img_description" and which can be used – via Quarry – for filtering. If e.g. this gets overwritten with License: {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} (...) it will be eventually harder to filter those uploads...
Will this have effect in summaries of filters established via Special Tags, like cross-wiki uploads (see also filter 153 --> "Cross-wiki upload from" in summary") + video uploads + OAuth Uploader + etc. ?
Aug 9 2016
Jul 28 2016
@matmarex: thx for your honest answer. I followed your attempts to make this thing working and I respect the work you dedicated for it.
Jul 26 2016
Finished now the analysis of cross-wiki-uploads from 15.07.2016–18.07.2016 via Quarry = User:Gunnex/Cross-wiki uploads 15.07.2016–18.07.2016
Jun 18 2016
Jun 10 2016
Jun 9 2016
"(...) I sometimes see in their upload summary "Cross-wiki upload from commons.wikimedia.org" --> this appears to be extremely rare --> if I managed to configue the Quarry Cross-wiki upload from commons.wikimedia.org (March 2016) (living & tagged & deleted) correctly, I got 0 rows for "Cross-wiki upload from commons.wikimedia.org" in March 2016 (with 36.478 cross-wiki uploads).
Jun 7 2016
FYI I:
Commons scope + upload wizard --> a discussion at Commons started with: "We have a serious problem with junk uploads. Wikimedia Zero in particular is terrible for reasons we've already established.[4] But in fact all uploads coming from new accounts have this problem. (...)"
Jun 4 2016
Jun 2 2016
May 29 2016
Update 29.05.2016 for User:Gunnex/Cross-wiki uploads 08.03.2016 = https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/9633:
May 16 2016
@matmarex: Thx for your feedback.
May 7 2016
Well, it appears that bad ratios of + 80% from cross-wiki uploads are - however - tolerated by... finally WMF — as I am seeing noone engaging more in this matter. If that is indeed the case, just give my — please — a feedback to just quit the job. I am obviously wasting my time here...
May 4 2016
Apr 20 2016
! In T131934#2224940, @DFoy wrote:
(...)
The users are amazingly adept at the process of switching sim cards around, and some phone models offer a multi-sim capacity so you can switch between carriers without opening the case. So to the point of the discussion, there is a very low barrier for most people to quickly switch between networks.
(...)
Apr 12 2016
So far I can analyze the situation (I am not a technician, just giving some feedback from the user front about what I am currently monitoring...), only a few uploads of copyrighted filmes/videos and music were triggered by abuse filter 149 (Wikipedia Zero uploads), assuming that most of them are using paid mobil (flat-rates), probadly also with better bandwidth to handle uploads up to 500 MB — 1 GB (complete films: Superman/Star Wars etc.). I remember the "Angola Fecebook Case" where especially some admins of related Facebook groups wasted mobile credits for "their" Facebook audience, providing music & video files via Commons. Btw, the "Angola Fecebook Case" was focused more on music (mostly ogg-files). The "Bangladesh Facebook Case" is more focused on films & videos (webm, ogv).
Apr 7 2016
Hi! Thx for the filter.
How I could track Wikipedia Zero uploads (on Commons) via Quarry? I checked +/- 24 h of Commons's abuse filter and +/- 98 % uploads are bad/nonsense/copyvios/out of project scope/etc.. As result, I would like to have something similar to Cross-wiki upload from pt.wikipedia.org (07.03.2016) (btw: with similar bad ratio via local Visual Editor) on a daily base — and comparing it on a same daily base with deletions, like Cross-wiki upload from pt.wikipedia.org (07.03.2016) (deleted) (in this example: 40 uploads and 36 deletions: bad ratio = 90 %). The goal is to monitoring the amount of Wikipedia Zero uploads at Commons, comparing it to related deletions and do statistics with "bad ratios".
The main issue (upload of copyrighted complete films/videos/musics etc. via the "Bangladesh Facebook Case") may be not covered by this filter because even today I (and other users) noticed several related uploads (shared instantly by Bangladesh Facebook groups) which were not covered by this abuse filter --> most likely uploaded via paid flat mobil contracts (with better bandwidth etc., consdering also uploads of complete films involving hundreds of megabytes till +1 GB of data).
Nevertheless, the filter is valuable to analyze the behaviour of Wikipedia Zero user. Currently, I would say: Commons = used by Wikipedia Zero users as a free image hoster for Facebook like profiles, ego-spam on local wikis, nonsense/attack images or illegal, spontaneous grabs from Internet / social media. In other words: the "educative" motive steps into the background. Or shorter: they don't care [about copyrights etc.]. It's something for free. It's Wikifacebook.
Mar 28 2016
In T130761#2149875, @Bawolff wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 10:20 PM:
Could someone link to some example files? Perhaps there's commonalities that could be identified by looking closer at the file.
Feb 24 2016
Feb 22 2016
Well, I'll continue my check — but the current interim results are IMHO not acceptable:
Feb 16 2016
Hi! Do you mean something like the (ongoing) check of Cross-wiki uploads from pt.wikipedia.org?