Stretch goal for 6.1. If its too complex or risky, lets retag into 6.1.1

related: https://github.com/wikimedia/wikipedia-ios/pull/2676

Caution: this might be more complex than it seems, since the description override can come from a transcluded template. For example, the article on San Antonio has an overridden description, but the description is actually auto-generated in a very convoluted way by the "Infobox settlement" template.

@JoeWalsh see Dmitry comment above. That explains the page you saw which had "local" as its description despite lacking the magic word template directly in its wikitext.

In that case, the service still seems to know its local, so it may be impossible to (in case 1) "open the Wikitext editor and place the cursor at the magic word." In those cases I still suggest we just open the wikitext editor, so knowledgeable editors can still perform the edits, even if we do not "assist" in any way.

Working well for me! Thanks so much @NHarateh_WMF! Now just to find more articles with out title descriptions!

I believe I have all the cases covered here:

For scenario 1 I used the 'San Antonio' article referenced by @Dbrant. I am seeing the wikitext editor, but it is difficult to tell where the cursor is placed.
For scenario 2 I used 'Aberfoyle railway station'. I am seeing the normal flow here.
For scenario 3 I used 'Eisenbahnunfall von Getå'. I am seeing the normal flow here as well.

I also tried a handful of articles in other languages as well.

Looking good across a few devices and over the last few builds and 6.2.0 (1563)

I used the same scenarios. In the case of Scenario 2, I am seeing the cursor in the right place.

For scenario 1 I used the 'San Antonio' article referenced by @Dbrant. I am seeing the wikitext editor, but it is difficult to tell where the cursor is placed.
For scenario 2 I used 'Aberfoyle railway station'. I am seeing the normal flow here.
For scenario 3 I used 'Eisenbahnunfall von Getå'. I am seeing the normal flow here as well.