Thanks for adding me @iamjessklein!

On the final to-do indicated here, @Volker_E let's test approaches to the user-scalable situation. I want to QA before implementing anything that could challenge animation playback.

I understand @Volker_E. Let's implement this darker (and correctly accessible) gray color.

@Volker_E That color correction for the Donor list is great. Let's implement!

Ah yes. There was originally a "hover" feature that was meant to make the chart somewhat interactive. We didn't like the User Experience so we asked for the developer to remove. They should have been entirely removed. This is disappointing to discover otherwise.

Amazing! There it is! Looking so good! THANK YOU GREG & BRIAN & DANIEL!

*Correction: meeting was 30 minutes. Perhaps meeting length could also be extended to improve results and understanding.

I've reviewed our timeline for this year's project and noted we had a 1hr alignment meeting between this group (security review) + Comms + the tech vendor on December 6, 2017. We can do earlier for next year/future projects, but we'll also need commitments to really make use of these alignment meetings to clarify precisely who and how we should coordinate tech hand-offs. Earlier meetings are only as good as the clarity they create.

We'll work on this today.

@Dzahn We are ready to go live now.

Want to apologize for the AR team's general ignorance here on Gerrit. This is the only time we use it!

Greg Varnum and are working on the uploads now.

@Reedy Correct. The update site files include a fonts folder to do that.

UPDATE #2: Files corrected per notes. They are here -> https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1sdMrFOTMhOGV9w1Eb-Fhvw_gAt3xIoEG

UPDATE: we will have revised files in the next few hours.

Brian, thank you. We are also really pleased with the site and are happy you like it too! ALL of these notes are good and help us improve the site.

@JMinor - Let me coordinate with Mel Kramer and Aubrie Johnson on the Facebook front. They are the social media leads, so they manage those relationships.

Seems like changed photos are not displaying (https://annual.wikimedia.org/2016/fact-8.html). @Varnent - any ideas on cause here?

Per conversations on Wikimedia-l (https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2017-March/086629.html) and with Foundation staff, we have made 5 adjustments to site content.

Thank you so much @dpatrick!

@Heather: Any reason not to use https://annual.wikimedia.org/2016/?