@Urbanecm Was it? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Chinese says ''eligible''

In T185799#3925607, @Dvorapa wrote:

@Urbanecm Was it? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Chinese says ''eligible''

Eligible ≠ approved
See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_proposal_policy#Requisites_for_eligibility

Yes, but this also does not mean 'rejected' => this task can stay stalled or needs to be declined?

@Dvorapa In fact it can be stalled, but stalled tasks are in all lists as 'to-do'. The way from eligible to approved is very very long and it doesn't make sense developers to pay attention to it.

Okay, just confused, thanks for explanation

In T185799#3925649, @Urbanecm wrote:

@Dvorapa In fact it can be stalled, but stalled tasks are in all lists as 'to-do'. The way from eligible to approved is very very long and it doesn't make sense developers to pay attention to it.

No need to, such tasks should only be re-opened when nearly all langcom members agree that, consult one of those peoples if you think this has benefit to be approved:
@Amire80 @Maor_X @GerardM @jhsoby @MF-Warburg @millosh @Baba_Tabita @SPQRobin @santhosh @satdeep_gill @StevenJ81 and @Doc_James

Leave it closed. There has been more activity lately, but much still by anonymous contributors. We don't have regular activity by at least three registered users per month. And it's not the place of @Assoc to open a task of this type.