@sbassett OATHAuth is bundled in the tarball so it should be announced/released with the normal MediaWiki security release rather than in a supplementary one.

In T240400#5846314, @Legoktm wrote:

@sbassett OATHAuth is bundled in the tarball...

Ah, so it is. Thanks.

{{draft}}

Subject: MediaWiki Extensions and Skins Security Release Supplement (1.31.7/1.33.3/1.34.1)

Greetings-

With the security/maintenance release of MediaWiki 1.31.7/1.33.3/1.34.1 [0], we would also like to provide this supplementary announcement of MediaWiki extensions and skins with now-public Phabricator tasks, security patches and backports [1]:

== MobileFrontend ==
+ (T240502, No CVE) - List known raw html messages
< https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/q/I301aee4093fe2b0e8f6dfe5422226bb80af1de20 >

== WikibaseMediaInfo ==
+ (T240773, CVE-2020-6163) - Escape labels in HTML output
< https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/q/If47903f11645e52d56a875be4c03de47400cef01 >

== Widgets ==
+ (T245850, CVE-2020-9382) - Title::newFromText() is not safe for user input
< https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/q/I953e060bc6994ffdba9f380c98173f53f8ca1ea8 >

== GlobalBlocking ==
+ (T229731, CVE-2020-10534) - Apply most specific global block
< https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/q/I9cc5fb2c08c78bbd797a5fc6d89f4577c8cc118b >

The Wikimedia Security Team recommends updating these extensions and/or skins to the current master branch or relevant, supported release branch [2] as soon as possible. Some of the referenced Phabricator tasks above _may_ still be private. Unfortunately, when security issues are reported, sometimes sensitive information is exposed and since Phabricator is historical, we cannot make these tasks public without exposing this sensitive information. If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding this update, please feel free to contact security@wikimedia.org or file a security task within Phabricator [3].

[0] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2020-March/093243.html
[1] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T240400
[2] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Version_lifecycle
[3] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reporting_security_bugs

Given that none of the listed tasks are private, does the note about tasks still private need to be included?

In T240400#6003324, @DannyS712 wrote:

Given that none of the listed tasks are private, does the note about tasks still private need to be included?

It's boilerplate. I don't think it matters