Evaluate which resource loader modules really need position => top and remove it from others.
Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
Whiteboard: code-quality
See Also:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
Evaluate which resource loader modules really need position => top and remove it from others.
Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
Whiteboard: code-quality
See Also:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | None | T57683 Bugs caught by mw.loader.inspect() (tracking) | |||
Resolved | Nikerabbit | T58292 Make ULS more lightweight | |||
Resolved | santhosh | T49075 Evaluate which resource loader modules really need position => top |
This is bit old, anyway, there were lot of refactoring around the RL modules of ULS. I am listing a set of bug reports and patches, that addressed this in direct and indirect way. The commit message and bug report discussions will provide history
The main idea was to keep only RLs with position top that affects the page flicker if not top loaded- mainly the ones that affect the page rendering. Following are the top loaded modules in master code right now: