This task will be revisited once the k8s infrastructure has moved to Debian Stretch. See also T197930: Replace pykube with a library that works with newer Kubernetes APIs

@bd808 @Andrew Can you tell me how the output should look like? For example -

@Andrew Hi! I do not have any classes from May to August. Thanks :)

Thank you so much for your input.

A library switch might need a lot of testing. Not sure if it's feasible to get some automated tests written prior to this.

Do you think allocating more time to this task would be a good idea? I think this type of issues will improve my understanding of the project.

@madhuvishy @Andrew @bd808
Hi, Could you please do a quick review of this proposal. Does the timeline look reasonable?

@bd808
@madhuvishy
@Andrew
Hi!
I am interested in this project for GSoC 2018. I have completed a microtask. I have started writing the proposal. I will try my best to complete this in time.

The mentors need to review this patch(https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/420238/) and add comments to the task.

Description - Grant proposal review tool for the Wikimedia Individual Engagement Grants project
Logo - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/iegreview/browse/master/public/images/glasses.png
In phabricator the project tag is Wikimedia-IEG-grant-review. @Niharika Could you please confirm this information

Phabricator repo - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/iegreview/
Github Mirror - https://github.com/wikimedia/wikimedia-iegreview
en.json - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/iegreview/browse/master/data/i18n/en.json
qqq.json - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/iegreview/browse/master/data/i18n/qqq.json
License - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/iegreview/browse/master/LICENSE.txt
@Nikerabbit Please let me know if you need any other information.

@Niharika Right now in the reports section, we have two options - Aggregated scores and wikitext export. Does this task mean adding another option in reports section for reviewers to display the reports they reviewed?

In this task, we would need to change the Communities.php . We would need to pull these values from the DB table of language communities to get rid of this duplicate list. Then, add a UI for admins so that they are able to add language communities and their codes in future. @bd808 Did I miss anything?

@bd808 Can we close this task now? or is there anything else that needs to be added?

Sorry about that. I'll try to get to it soon

@bd808 That's alright. Should I work on this task right now or wait for the other patch to get reviewed?
Did you mean to keep a track of the locks acquired by the transaction in AbstractDao::transactionStart/transactionCommit?

These tests were failing because I did not correctly build the grants app.

Hi @Niharika .
Are you talking about this task or in general? I have uploaded a patch to this task. I think this task needs to be in the needs review section.
I have started working on this task - T119534. This task might take more time since my semester final exams are this week. If I have any questions, I will ping you or Bryan on IRC. Do you have any other task for me?

@bd808 Is this the library that we need to integrate https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-oauthclient-php?

You are right. I should complete T114969 first. Thanks

In T114969#3772317, @bd808 wrote:

The Scholarships commits rWWSCfe8ff368fd82: Require wikimedia/slimapp and rWWSC9c5020ccc54e: Use Slimapp classes show a similar migration that was done in the past.

In T177770#3713848, @srishakatux wrote:

@Nehajha hello Neha! Thank you for submitting the proposal! I see that in the Outreachy application system, for question 8(iii), you have not provided a link to a curriculum. Could you please upload it in the next couple days? Thank you!

I haven't completed the submission but I filled the eligibility details of the application. I did not get any information regarding my eligibility. Could you confirm this for me?

Ah, that's not the right page. Go to Admin > Manage Campaigns > Report by Reviewer. (Make sure you have some reviewed proposals first)

Thanks for the steps.

I want to work on this issue. Could you please help me reproduce this? I checked the aggregated scores page which doesn't show abandoned proposals.

The table seems to have an extraneous column in some rows. Maybe look around at some other tasks to understand the markup better. :)

Hi @Niharika @bd808
I am writing the proposal for my outreachy application.

I would like to work on this task. Could you help me reproduce the issue? @bd808

I am working on this task. For updates, I added the ?items=5 and various other numbers but the pagination button did not appear. So, I added the statement SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS in aggregatedScores(). The pagination button appeared but only in URLs containing ?items=2. The main report page still does not have pagination button.

Thank you so much.
I have reported the test failures T176072
I am still getting familiar with phabricator and arcanist. Is there a way to claim these tasks?
Is there a tutorial that I can follow to submit patches to the repo?

Hi,
My name is Neha Jha. I am a Computer Science Student. I wish to take part in this round of Outreachy.
I encountered a few problems while setting up the environment. After googling a bit, I was able to run the application locally.
Here is a screenshot for that: