User Details
- User Since
- Nov 22 2021, 10:00 PM (126 w, 4 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- JHathaway
- MediaWiki User
- JHathaway (WMF) [ Global Accounts ]
Today
Thu, Apr 18
Wed, Apr 17
Given that this has reoccurred and from the emails you provided looks to be duplication on the application layer I think we need to rope in some people on the Mediawiki side. @larissagaulia do you know who might be a first point of contact?
Mon, Apr 15
Tue, Apr 9
Mon, Apr 8
patch is merged, waiting on a new release, https://github.com/kubernetes/minikube/pull/18233
@bcampbell setting this to declined, please reopen, if this is still a concern
After doing some exploration I don't think emulation is viable due to the complexity and the performance, so blocking this task until T320811 is resolved. In the interim running dcl on WMCS looks to be the best alternative.
Fri, Apr 5
@Xover if you could paste the headers of two of the messages that would help, the whole raw text would be the best however. I am curious how identical the emails are, as that would help indicate where they are being duplicated.
Wed, Apr 3
part of bookworm upgrade sprint week, but I ran out of time, not currently prioritizing this work.
Tue, Apr 2
Mon, Apr 1
@DBu-WMF the current dmarc monitoring is still a work in progress. ITS has purchased a subscription to dmarcdigests via the security budget, which is currently active, but they are not intending to keep the service long term. However you can open a ticket with ITS to request access, while it is still available. As another route @Jgreen wrote some scripts for ingesting the reports for their own needs and we briefly discussed reusing that tooling outside of fund raising tech, but the work has not been planned as of yet.
Mar 22 2024
Thanks for the poke @RoySmith, ITS obtained this information from Zendesk on how Zendesk's spam marking system operates:
@SLyngshede-WMF let's move discussion to phabricator. I tried the updated patch on my x86_64 hackintosh with minikube 1.32:
Feb 26 2024
Feb 24 2024
Feb 23 2024
well how does PHID-TASK-5tckxnd23nugdvfo3ziu, relate to T358398?
great, thanks!
Feb 22 2024
@fgiunchedi any update on the phab acccount, should I reach out to someone?
obtained, and seems to work, closing
Feb 15 2024
For reasons that are not clear, we stopped compressing on May 30th of 2023 we also don't seem to have any deletion rules in place.
Feb 14 2024
@RoySmith I also asked ITS if we could use phabricator to communicate, since it is accessible by volunteers.
thanks for the additional context @Muehlenhoff!
Feb 13 2024
@Muehlenhoff I think that makes sense, are the updates run manually when Debian issues a release?
Feb 9 2024
@RoySmith did you ever here anything back from the ticket you opened? Also, you said this was mentioned in another forum, in what context, was there another message marked as spam?
Feb 8 2024
Feb 6 2024
sounds good, happy to help
@Jgreen the tool only provides a graph and a percentage, I have added you as a viewer of the domain, https://postmaster.google.com. If that doesn't work I am happy to screen share, or drop some pics on this ticket.
@Dwisehaupt postmaster tools shows dmarc failures for this domain. Do you know where it is being actively used in emails being sent out?
other than one-click unsubscribe, we are in compliance
@bcampbell I assume this is resolved, please go ahead and reopen if it is not.
obtained the credentials from @bcampbell, now I need to test them!
Feb 2 2024
@ssingh thanks for the analysis, I am pretty sure it is correct. @bking as to your question, redacting passwords would be preferred. However, before we figure out if that is necessary, @Joe do you think you could weigh in on the use of wmflib::autogen_password, it wasn't clear to me from the git history as to its intended use?
Has anyone ever looked at the project-group-structure plugin, which allows for access scoped project creation?
Jan 31 2024
Since VRTS is sending under <SUPPORT LIST>@wikimedia.org domain, most of what applies to the wikimedia.org domain applies here. Google sees the domain as in compliance with dkim, spf & dmarc.
auth results on my personal gmail instance:
@bcampbell patch is merged, if you want to give it a whirl!
Jan 30 2024
@bcampbell patch is out for review
ah, that seems like a bug? However, dkim signature should be okay, since our dmarc record is set to relaxed. Which allows subdomain matching, i.e. dkim: wikimedia.org aligns with from: no-reply@phabricator.wikimedia.org.
After reading this post on reddit, I think I finally grok the intended setup, apologies for being a bit dense on this one:
I believe so, for instance here what I get from a mail from services.discover.com on my personal account:
Jan 29 2024
@bcampbell do you have any idea why this might be? Not a critical issue, but it is nice to be able to check how a single message is validated by Google.
It appears to point to an SPF record:
@AlexisJazz were you able to reproduce?