Page move vandalism creates watchlist clutter
OpenPublic

Description

Author: wikimedia

Description:
Anyone who has a substantial and established watchlist on a wiki like Wikipedia probably has some unwelcome additions to it since they added the first items. Every time a page move vandal moves a watched page to a title which is subsequently reverted and deleted, a redlink to the title is left behind in the watchlist of everybody who was watching the page. The result is when I actually checked my list recently to prune some entries, it was full of redlinks to pages like [[HAGGER???????]] and [[George W. Bush on Wheels!!!]].

Needless to say this looks pretty bad to anybody who isn't familiar with the vandalism which goes on an is a royal pain to clear out.

Obviously normally it makes sense to watch both the source and destination of a page move. It also makes sense to keep watching a page which has been deleted if you specifically asked to watch. I don't know if this kind of information is readily available in the MW database, but I'd think the logical thing to do is if a page watched as the result of a page move is deleted, then it gets unwatched. Or possibly this is something that can be integrated into the function of rollback/revert buttons.


Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit
See Also:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3185

bzimport added a project: MediaWiki-Watchlist.Via ConduitNov 21 2014, 10:03 PM
bzimport added a subscriber: wikibugs-l.
bzimport set Reference to bz13602.
bzimport created this task.Via LegacyApr 3 2008, 12:06 PM
bzimport added a comment.Via ConduitOct 30 2008, 5:16 AM

mike.lifeguard+bugs wrote:

(In reply to comment #0)
[...]

Obviously normally it makes sense to watch both the source and destination of a
page move. It also makes sense to keep watching a page which has been deleted
if you specifically asked to watch. I don't know if this kind of information is
readily available in the MW database, but I'd think the logical thing to do is
if a page watched as the result of a page move is deleted, then it gets
unwatched. Or possibly this is something that can be integrated into the
function of rollback/revert buttons.

Perhaps I'm dense, but what is the obvious reason for watching the redirect page after someone moves a page?

siebrand added a comment.Via ConduitFeb 2 2009, 11:42 AM

Changing component to "Watchlist"

bzimport added a comment.Via ConduitFeb 2 2009, 11:59 AM

wikimedia wrote:

(In reply to comment #1)

Perhaps I'm dense, but what is the obvious reason for watching the redirect
page after someone moves a page?

Mmm, good point. I could think of a couple of scenarios where it would be useful but actually would then be doing decision-making on your behalf on a level which is only useful in a few select cases. Unwatching shadow redirects seems sensible.

Thryduulf added a comment.Via ConduitJun 30 2009, 11:06 AM

See also Bug 3185 "Page move rollback should not leave a redirect", if this were in place then there would be redirect from the vandalised title for you to be watching.

MarkAHershberger added a comment.Via ConduitOct 11 2011, 7:54 PM

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=455038876&oldid=455033536

: I just checked the list of pages on my watchlist and I spotted ''Hurricane Shit (2011)'' and ''Hurricane Shithead'', even though I never watchlisted or visited them.

MarkAHershberger added a comment.Via ConduitMar 9 2012, 5:21 AM

Only person who has touched this in the past 3 years is me. Lowering priority.

Add Comment

Column Prototype
This is a very early prototype of a persistent column. It is not expected to work yet, and leaving it open will activate other new features which will break things. Press "\" (backslash) on your keyboard to close it now.