Page MenuHomePhabricator

Review draft Content Translation schema from engineering perspective
Closed, ResolvedPublic


Now that the draft Content Translation schema has been developed, it needs to be reviewed by an engineer on the language team. The engineer should:

  • Look for anything that will be difficult or infeasible to implement, or would be easier to implement in a different form
  • Flag anything in the choice, naming, or description of events that seems mistaken or incomplete (remember that the schema was developed by a data scientist who is not an expert on the functionality of ContentTranslation!)
  • Ensure that they understand the intention of the schema well enough to implement the instrumentation code
  • Answer any specific questions flagged for engineering ("ENG")
  • Check for anything mistaken or incomplete in the diagram of event flows

Event Timeline

We're putting this on hold until section translation is released to the first wiki (T271397).

I discussed the schema some time ago with @ngkountas and @santhosh. They gave me some helpful suggestions and said it looked good otherwise. I've just finished adjusting the draft to incorporate their suggestions.