@Ijon Sorry - I was under the impression that there had been some community push back at some point in the past. I must have misunderstood. I think we're all sold on the benefits of releasing this data, I was just seeking to specifically try to address community concerns that I thought had been raised.

@Ijon I'm working on an explanation to the community for why we feel this is a low risk data set to release in spite of the ability to potentially identify an editor's country. My understanding is that this data set (or something like it) was previously published but then pulled down due to community response - do you have any links to previous community concerns? I'd like to address the issues specifically, if possible, or at least understand the specific issues raised. Thanks in advance.

@leila and @Gilles I'll work on this. I'll get started on it as soon as I can, but is there a particular timeline we're tracking to?

Pinging @JBennett for approval.