Wed, Nov 15
Tue, Nov 14
@Pirroh I realize now that I'm using "article-centric" and "category-centric" terms inconsistent with our usage in the paper which is confusing. Sorry. What I meant was this:
Mon, Nov 13
@bd808 looks good to me. I'm done for now, unless you ping me or we hear about the privacy statement.
- Re privacy statement, I'm reviewing the survey now and I'll follow this page which will give you a privacy statement. Please review the intro paragraphs to last year's survey and confirm that from your pov, this is what we want to do this year, too. (I went over them now and they still make sense to me.)
- Has anyone opted out of the survey last year? They would email bd808 at wikimedia per instructions. If yes, please make sure you exclude them from the list of recipients for this year's survey.
- If you have a way to link emails to wikitech usernames and the user has disabled "Email this user" feature, please interpret that as the user does not want to receive an email about the survey either.
Thu, Nov 9
I thought Cervisiarius will give us until Monday before we start this. I guess the answer is no. :D
@DarTar thanks for the feedback. I resolved all of them, and responded to one question about whether we had 3 of them before or 4 (there were 4 of them since in 2016 we had two).
Wed, Nov 8
@diego Dario likes to keep the tasks open and stacked in the Done lane, so he can use them at the time of quarterly review. For that purpose, I'm going to reopen this task and move it to Done.
Tue, Nov 7
@DarTar transferring the task to you. Please review and edit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/129tB6Oge5jtG-mVk5xRaEn5cAEmU6OvEvUq6GsaK5tI/edit#heading=h.wbd4oqlx2dxk
Cervisiarius has created the first draft. Going over and updating it now.
Fri, Nov 3
hmm. I forgot to resolve this. This had been done and confirmed on 2017-09-18.
Thu, Nov 2
The blog post is published at https://i9606.blogspot.com/2017/06/building-communities-of-knowledge-with.html If we want to write a new blog post about it, Andrew will be the right person to reach out to. I'm going to resolve this task as the blog post is out, not in Wikimedia Blog though.
Wed, Nov 1
@DarTar I'm assigning this to you as you have taken over this space. Let me know if you need help (and this specific task may even be done by now.:)
@DarTar I'm assigning this to you as you've picked up this space. Feel free to ping if you need help.
@Pirroh I think we should divide https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Expanding_Wikipedia_articles_across_languages#Online_Evaluation to two parts, category-centric evaluation and article-centric. We can then explain the set up of the category centric evaluation, ideally with a screenshot of what the people could see, plus why we didn't continue it. Can you start this and I review and add more content to it?
@Pirroh two questions:
- can you update https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Expanding_Wikipedia_articles_across_languages#Experienced_editor_evaluation with the results?
- do you want to continue collecting data or shall I tell people that we're good with the results submitted so far and we will stop?
Done. do not hold your breath.
@srodlund can you help us with moving this showcase to December 13? (currently scheduled for the 20th on the Staff Calendar).
Fri, Oct 27
I'm for now picking this task up as we have some evaluations going on at the moment which can fall under this task.
Abstract submitted. work on the paper continues.
Wed, Oct 25
@Rafaesrey I just checked the query and I can relatively easily help you this year, no problem. I've made a note on my calendar that you want the data in the week of 2018-02-05 (I by mistake had set it to 2018-01-05 but I think we agreed to do this in February). I will move this task to Staged on our end which means it's ready to be executed when the time arrives. I will do this in that week.
Tue, Oct 24
For when we come back to this open question: Article Wizard is now redesigned to help editors disclose COI and paid editing. (Check this comment for more details.) The link to the page that helps the editor navigate through reporting COI or paid editing is here.
Mon, Oct 23
@Erik_Zachte I just added it as a subtask. For the future, you can click on Edit Related Task on the top right-hand-side of your page and then click on Edit Subtasks and add the phabricator ticket number to be added as a subtask. If the subtask didn't exit, you would click on Edit Related Tasks and then Create Subtask. Please ping me off-thread if you'd like to indulge in more phabricator tips and tricks. ;)
Thanks, @Milimetric .
Oct 13 2017
@Milimetric this is the repeat of the last year's request. Are you aware of any changes in geowiki data collection and storage that may become a blocker for sharing this data with GII folks? (FYI, the query we used last year is at T131889#3033103)
Oct 12 2017
/facepalm @Pirroh for archive happiness: I was using the old link. sorry about that.
Oct 11 2017
no. in incognito and with hard refresh it still demonstrates the same problem: it takes a long time to load the page and it eventually shows time out. Can it be that you're reading from cache?
@Pirroh it's not loading for me again. Let's bring Baha in to help. I'll message off-thread.
Oct 10 2017
@Cervisiarius what is your wikitech username? Also, can you generate a new public/private key and paste the public key in this task as a comment?
@DarTar Per our conversation: the plan is that you reach out to Cornell/Jigsaw folks to see if they can or want to present on this date or they prefer a later month. If they decide not to, I'd like to take the full hour for the state of the knowledge gap research.
Oct 5 2017
@DarTar TP9 and TP12 are ready from my pov and for this deadline. I'll await feedback from you and others before further fine-tuning on Monday/Tuesday.
Oct 4 2017
@Pirroh I want to put it in the quarterly review slide deck, but if people go to it and doesn't work, it's not cool. :D
@bmansurov got it. Thanks.
@bmansurov In your mind, does creating a tool involve creating a Labs API as well? (We didn't discuss APIs but as I was thinking about the workflow I realized that in the past we have created APIs used by the tool so others can use the APIs for other purposes as well).
@Pirroh is the tool up? I can't access it. And while we're at it I'm wondering: this seems to be a kind of tool we need engineering help to maintain, expand, etc. Does it make sense to ask Baha to help with surfacing it somewhere on Wikimedia end?
Oct 3 2017
@DarTar if you want, we can close this task (given that you've applied and got the funder ID) and open a new one that captures how we should reference it and under what conditions? I don't think this is relevant to our upcoming WWW submission, but I'd like to make sure, now that we have the funder ID in place. Also, probably we want to work with Grants team to make sure the language is used in publications by grantees?