Per T345118, offering people feedback about how likely experienced volunteers are to consider the source they are attempting to add to be reliable depends on the existence of a machine-readable "list" wikis can use to store/encode the current reliability consensus of a given source.
This task involves the work of proposing a format for said list that is:
- Sufficiently explicit to be machine readable and
- Expressive enough to hold the nuanced and non-binary nature of WP:RSP and other pages like it [i]
- It'll be important that this list include a field for volunteers to be able to specify what feedback message people see when attempting to cite a given source.