DONE
✅ DONE (1) - will be addressed in T358659 The fields correctly intercept invalid value such as 0.002 - the warning appears. But the suggested values (from the value selector at the end of the field) include negative values.
Another example of handling numbers in the fields - large numbers are accepted and converted to scientific notation:
✅ DONE (2 - the single quotes are removed as part of T361933) Do we need single quotes around Mentorship?
✅ DONE (3)- resolved x (in the above screenshot) I didn't find the presence of this control in figma design
✅ DONE (4) - will be addressed; see the comment https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T361324#9699966**
Mentorship** section in Special:EditGrowthConfig has information that is not present on Special:CommunityConfiguration/Mentorship
 |  |
- Special:EditGrowthConfig has "Know more about how mentorship works" link to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Growth/FAQ#Mentorship
- probably would be good to have links to "Special:EnrollasMentor" and "Special:ClaimMentee"
✅ DONE (5) - will be addressed The fields occupy the whole page width (Special:EditGrowthConfig limits the fields length).
✅ DONE (6) - To be covered in T367133: Community Configuration: Save Changes Edit Summary improvements @Tacsipacsi comment T354463#9674654
I noticed two differences that I’m not sure if they are intentional:
- The (optional) text is bold. In both designs in the description, it has a normal weight.
- The summary box is huge. In one design, it’s a two-line textbox, in the other one, it’s a one-line input; in the implementation, it’s eight lines >tall. This gives the impression that the edit summary can be however long I want it to be (and indeed, nothing on the frontend prevents me >from writing an over 1000 characters long summary, even though the backend (MW core) caps the summary at 500 characters).
Two minor questions:
- on submitting edits in VE, there is a footer with legal clause with links to licensees and to the Terms of Use. Do we need a link to the Terms of Use in the Edit Summary too?
- the placement of the Reminder is the same as for the footer for saving edits which might confuse those users who used to see different footer.
What if both messages were displayed below each other, with the Reminder being above and maybe on a grey background (like the checkboxes in VE)? Especially the color difference would stress that this is not just the usual stuff.
✅ DONE (7)- works as intended from T357710#9733651
- The list of suggestions displays the titles in black, not in blue (as links) as they are displayed in produciton:
| eswiki beta | production |
|---|---|
 |  |
- the text field doesn't have the input text placeholder
- the invalid input (no matching pages) has no indication that it's invalid
| eswiki beta | production |
|---|---|
  |   |
✅ DONE (8) will be done in T366270 The first field on Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits - Infobox templates in its current implementation doesn't have links
- to Special:NewcomerTasksInfo
- to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Growth/Personalized_first_day/Structured_tasks/Add_an_image
Figma design has such links.
✅ DONE (9) - addressed, see this comment https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T361324#9877929 Should "Give feedback" option be on every module page?
(10) and (11) are from this comment - T360471#9831541
✅ DONE (10) - will be addressed in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T361324
Add a link section
Currently in production two add link tasks (structured and un-structured types) have the same title: Add links between articles. The figma design also uses the same title for both type of tasks (to differentiate them two icons are used). On Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits two different titles are used - Add links between articles and Add a link - was it documented somewhere that there would be two different titles?
The robot icon was used to differentiate between structured (algorithm-suggested) tasks and others - in betalabs the robot icon was not present.
✅ DONE (11) will be done in T367201 there are two fields added to the end of Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits page - Weight of underlinked articles and Minimum required link score. Those fields are not present on Special:EditGrowthConfig or in the figma design. Such fields might require some technical knowledge and an additional understanding of a suggested link algorithm - is it expected from admin users?
