Completed? I see over 800 repositories in diffusion, https://git.wikimedia.org/projects counts about 1200.

In T616#993011, @Nemo_bis wrote:

Completed? I see over 800 repositories in diffusion, https://git.wikimedia.org/projects counts about 1200.

Not quite. We've been having a minor issue importing a few, so they're on hold pending the next code pull.

So I assume this is blocked by T87282 ?

Most repos are done now. Will tidy up the remaining ones.

This is basically almost all done.

Seems more have been migrated since @demon last comment. Mind adding a status update?

How to keep up with new repositories?

In T616#1320300, @hashar wrote:

Seems more have been migrated since @demon last comment. Mind adding a status update?

In T616#1424341, @QuimGil wrote:

How to keep up with new repositories?

@demon: Could you answer that (if you know)? Or do you know who could answer that?

Could we please please have an update on this? The extension I'm currently writing as a GSoC project (phab: MediaWiki-extensions-SmiteSpam, gerrit: mediawiki/extensions/SmiteSpam) is on the list of pending imports to Diffusion and this makes writing things like T101095: Weekly reports for Extension:SmiteSpam very very annoying because I have to link commit hashes to gerrit manually. 😢

@polybuildr: rSSPM

In T616#1480329, @mmodell wrote:

rSSPM

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Diffusion/Callsign_naming_conventions

In T616#1424341, @QuimGil wrote:

How to keep up with new repositories?

Change https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/New_repositories to require this when creating new ones.

Our callsign naming conventions make no sense and limiting callsigns to 4 characters serves no purpose at all.

In T616#1480368, @mmodell wrote:

Our callsign naming conventions make no sense and limiting callsigns to 4 characters serves no purpose at all.

Related and maybe a better place for general discussions: T101358: Update {{git file}} to link to diffusion, T106130: Phund Phacility to rid us of callsigns

In T616#1480368, @mmodell wrote:

Our callsign naming conventions make no sense and limiting callsigns to 4 characters serves no purpose at all.

We're not debating it again. Please stick to the conventions no matter how dumb you may think them.

In T616#1481914, @demon wrote:

In T616#1480368, @mmodell wrote:

Our callsign naming conventions make no sense and limiting callsigns to 4 characters serves no purpose at all.

We're not debating it again. Please stick to the conventions no matter how dumb you may think them.

I wasn't included in the original debate about callsigns. I did stick to the 4 character rule, even though I disagree with it. I wasn't aware of the prefix standards, I actually can see some value in standardized prefixes.

@mmodell, thanks a lot for importing! You're awesome. :D

In T108902#1567500, @demon wrote:

Any repo created after I mass-created them awhile back is likely to be missing. Individual tasks to import missing ones are...less than useful...as I prefer to do them in batches.

Is there a task to make diffusion automatically sync from gerrit/gitblit, or is that considered obvious as part of this task?

That doesn't block this. Repos can be imported to Diffusion without the template updates. In fact, the vast majority already have. The dependency should probably be between T108864 and T110607.

In T616#1603958, @Nemo_bis wrote:

In T108902#1567500, @demon wrote:

Any repo created after I mass-created them awhile back is likely to be missing. Individual tasks to import missing ones are...less than useful...as I prefer to do them in batches.

Is there a task to make diffusion automatically sync from gerrit/gitblit, or is that considered obvious as part of this task?

Obvious, I guess.

In T108902#1567500, @demon wrote:

Any repo created after I mass-created them awhile back is likely to be missing. Individual tasks to import missing ones are...less than useful...as I prefer to do them in batches.

So you want endless additions to this page? Here's another:

• please set up mediawiki/extensions/QuickSurveys in Diffusion, thanks.

In T616#1603958, @Nemo_bis wrote:

Is there a task to make diffusion automatically sync from gerrit/gitblit, or is that considered obvious as part of this task?

??

In T616#1480363, @JanZerebecki proposed:

In T616#1424341, @QuimGil wrote:

How to keep up with new repositories?

Change https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/New_repositories to require this when creating new ones.

Those are instructions to the owner of a project. Whoever responds to their request should do this diffusion and callsign work. I added https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/New_repositories#Callsign , but it seems silly to have a step "After you request a repository with this form, make another request for it to be set up in diffusion as well."

In T616#1661452, @Spage wrote:

In T108902#1567500, @demon wrote:

Any repo created after I mass-created them awhile back is likely to be missing. Individual tasks to import missing ones are...less than useful...as I prefer to do them in batches.

So you want endless additions to this page? Here's another:

• please set up mediawiki/extensions/QuickSurveys in Diffusion, thanks.

No. I'm working on a script that will handle these automatically so nobody has to remind anyone about it.

In T616#1603958, @Nemo_bis wrote:

Is there a task to make diffusion automatically sync from gerrit/gitblit, or is that considered obvious as part of this task?

??

See above.

In T616#1480363, @JanZerebecki proposed:

In T616#1424341, @QuimGil wrote:

How to keep up with new repositories?

Change https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/New_repositories to require this when creating new ones.

Those are instructions to the owner of a project. Whoever responds to their request should do this diffusion and callsign work. I added https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/New_repositories#Callsign , but it seems silly to have a step "After you request a repository with this form, make another request for it to be set up in diffusion as well."

The whole process on that page is already broke anyway. We need to rethink it.

@demon: it looks like upstream has a solution for us:

@epriestley wrote:
"Yeah, I'm planning to convert the "Clone As" setting to "optional, unique repository name" and use it as an identifier in URIs if it's set."

Maybe a note should be added to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/New_repositories/Requests so that an admin knows to create the project in gerrit and import to phabricator.

In T616#1845233, @Paladox wrote:

Maybe a note should be added to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/New_repositories/Requests so that an admin knows to create the project in gerrit and import to phabricator.

If you want, but @demon gets them whenever he does his latest batch of new imports (he does them in batches to save his time).

Seems that there only needs to be a few repos created in phabricator. I'm not sure how many and from now on when a repo is created in gerrit it should also be created in phabricator.

If we create new repositories in Gerrit are they going to be automatically imported in Diffusion?

no, see T128757: Add docs about importing newly created repositories to Diffusion

@hashar the admin who creates the repo has been asked to also create it in diffusion.

In T616#1604430, @demon wrote:

Is there a task to make diffusion automatically sync from gerrit/gitblit, or is that considered obvious as part of this task?

Obvious, I guess.

Hmm.