@Volker_E can you give an estimate for when you'll be able to complete "Recent Update cards" above? @DarTar and I are trying to finalize content for launch. LMK if you have questions about requirements beyond what I've described in the task description.
Thu, Jan 11
Declined by CHI 2018 :( re-submitting to ICWSM 2018
@Whatamidoing-WMF I would double-check with legal on this. Just because the microsurvey is a MediaWiki extension doesn't necessarily mean that it needs to adhere to the same standards as AFT, or that oversighters need to be involved. Unless I missed something. I assume the data will be captured and stored privately and securely, and made available (if at all) after the fact. So from a legal perspective whether the survey responses will be public or not will be handled by the consent form, and our default is to let people know that they are releasing their responses into the public domain.
Dec 19 2017
Dec 18 2017
Sounds good, @DarTar
Added reporting piece to Q3 as a separate task T183202, and updated Q3 goals on wiki: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technology/Goals/2017-18_Q3#Program_4:_Technical_community_building
Dec 11 2017
Nov 29 2017
@Volker_E just a quick note that I see these changes and am grateful. Please keep me posted! Thanks, J
Nov 27 2017
Also, @Volker_E Have you done any work on the 3-column link list class (see ticket description above for details)? Looking at your commit history, I don't think you explicitly created this as a class. I tried to 'fake' it by using featured project cards, but it didn't work well, for two reasons:
@Volker_E I added content using the new team member and featured project cards. I'm running into a small alignment problem with both classes: They align on the bottom instead of the top. This creates 'crooked' rows when there are different amounts of content on adjacent cards.
Update: submitted an updated manuscript to CHI 2018 conference in Sept. Reviews were largely positive. Submitted rebuttal in Nov. Will hear back on final acceptance on Dec 11.
Nov 24 2017
The shawn table belonged to Shawn Walker, a research intern in 2011. These tables can be safely deleted.
Nov 20 2017
Nov 15 2017
There's also the upcoming WMF.org revamp to consider. Not many details on what will be displayed there, but there may be opportunities to advertise our design org and activities there (for certain audiences).
Nov 14 2017
@Volker_E Couple questions:
Nov 13 2017
Nov 7 2017
Awesome, @Neil_P._Quinn_WMF cheers to you for taking a user-centered approach to building WMF products ;) I should make you a barnstar.
Nov 6 2017
@DarTar I've created a research page for this project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Growth_and_diversity_of_Technology_team_audiences
@Deskana @Neil_P._Quinn_WMF @jmatazzoni I see that this is being de-prioritized. I understand that y'all are busy and that impact analysis is often seen as an unnecessary extra step, especially when the product seems to be "working fine", but I think in this case it would be really useful to perform such an analysis. If Neil or some other analyst wants to take this on, I can collaborate with that person on the study design.
If y'all have questions on how to create such a page, what info should go on it, etc. I'm happy to help!
@debt @Ramsey-WMF I think you should create a project page in the Research namespace on Meta (and then link to it from the page you mention above). Here's an example research page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Supporting_Commons_contribution_by_GLAM_institutions
Oct 19 2017
Oct 17 2017
Oct 13 2017
Oct 5 2017
okay, @leila. LMK if you want to follow up. I have no plans to think about this in the next few weeks.
Oct 3 2017
Sep 27 2017
Sep 26 2017
We decided not to do anything around this for Q2.
Sep 25 2017
Survey privacy statement: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/GLAM_Donation_Survey_Privacy_Statement
Where was the Teahouse extension enabled? I've only ever seen it on testwiki. I know that it was never enabled on EnWiki.
Sep 14 2017
@Lucie I sent you an email at your ac.uk address on Monday, requesting the title and abstract for your talk. If you just plan on talking about your recent OpenSym paper, we can mine that for the title and abstract. Just let me and @DarTar know (by tomorrow, if possible).
Sep 11 2017
@Volker_E that makes perfect sense. In fact, I realized that I was being premature and added two other requirements (also sent to you in email). Thanks for being on top of it!
@Volker_E per our email discussion, it sounds like neither of the nav/template related requirements are going to be available for launch. Should we keep this task open in case other requirements emerge, or close it for now?
Sep 8 2017
Sep 7 2017
@leila great! I would love to talk to you about this, and see if it still makes sense given where you're at (and where you're headed) on your projects. Let's meet up sometime (perhaps after you get back?)