fixed by Para. Thank you.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Jul 10 2020
Jul 9 2020
Jun 14 2020
If communities want to continue to use where they should contact to get some of the teams to be responsible? (afaik this is the current situation as there is no replacement and the communities like it as a tool)
Apr 8 2020
So,. if I understand correctly the problem is that the views used currently in the tool labs are fucked by design and because that everything is unusable slow?
Mar 10 2020
pushing this little bit up. It would be nice to get goodfaith working.
Mar 4 2020
In T246720#5938796, @Wickie37 wrote:Looks like I was right with the faulty 'fp_stable' in the 'flaggedpages' db table:
Yes, the sql fiwiki_p connects to fiwiki.analytics.db.svc.eqiad.wmflabs .
Mar 3 2020
Bug: Try to edit a specific page on deWP throws InvalidArgumentException T246720
Feb 26 2020
One clear use case for Wikimedia editors who aren't coder but who can write/modify SPARQL queries is to sort and filter Petscan and Listeria results.
Feb 24 2020
Sorry, it had wrong quarry id. https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/42368 is correct one.
Feb 23 2020
@Reedy I hava an idea why the autopromote is broken.
In T237191#5910169, @Brainswiffer wrote:Thanks a lot. Not so much. Nevertheless: Is there any admin willing to give the rights manually for this 49 persons?
In T237191#5909711, @Brainswiffer wrote:Is it possible to make a quick and dirty solution: Is it possible to get a list of users waiting for this rights manually and then we only need an admin who sets the rights. Solution seems to be very urgent
Feb 19 2020
In T234743#5896089, @JEumerus wrote:I believe what Doug Weller is trying to say is that enwiki oversighters are all admins and admins on enwiki hold the "review" permission.
Feb 18 2020
Feb 16 2020
Any hope that this would go forward?
Feb 14 2020
Feb 3 2020
Masumrezarock100 wrote:In T234743#5843628, @Xaosflux wrote:Note on the screen shot from Cyphoidbomb's failure above, this is referencing a group that doesn't even exist on enwiki "Editors".
A bug like this isn't so surprising since FlaggedRevs is buggy and has no maintainer currently But not sure why it is affecting Translate extension.
Dec 26 2019
The second option could be to set wgFlaggedRevsHandleIncludes to FR_INCLUDES_CURRENT ( value = 0 ) in InitialiseSettings.php so that FlaggedRevs would not track the included pages. However, this would mean that there would not be notifications from the file, module or template changes in articles either. If you doesn't need those notifications then this would simplify the user interface and this would be my recommendation.
Probably related to edits made on MediaWiki-extensions-FlaggedRevs (MediaWiki 1.35/wmf.10)
Dec 24 2019
If we just want quickfix for autopromote with some features missing then it editor/autoreview/reviewer groups could just added via wmgAutopromoteExtraGroups or wmgAutopromoteOnceonEdit in InitialiseSettings.php
Dec 22 2019
I think that this is because page uses the talk page in a way that it is included as a template. (ie. there is a link in templatelinks database table between page and the talk page) the edits of the talk page will be handled like the edits to templates used in the article.
Dec 17 2019
Based on Manual:$wgExtensionFunctions: This variable is an array that stores functions to be called after most of MediaWiki initialization is complete. Note however that at this point the RequestContext is not yet fully set up, so attempting to use it (or equivalent globals such as $wgUser or $wgTitle) is liable to fail in odd ways. If you need to use the RequestContext, consider the BeforeInitialize and ApiBeforeMain hooks instead.
Tested that flaggedrevs_promote is still updated
Dec 14 2019
In plwiki it stopped working also at 23:17, 24 June 2019 ( log )
In T237191#5741228, @Masumrezarock100 wrote:@Zache Could you confirm that auto-promotion stopped working on Finnish Wikipedia?
Dec 12 2019
This can be also reproduced in Finnish Wikipedia. (it reproduces always, but minimal ui will make it more visible in fiwiki)
Dec 10 2019
One thing to check would how the change affected the review workload and review backlog. Ie was there effect on the number of reviewers and how reviews per the reviewer are distributed between users.
Nov 28 2019
Autopromote is broken for FlaggedRevs, so it is one high priority bug more. T237191
Nov 8 2019
just note for myself. Wikimedia commons requires also local mediawiki:lang/langcode pages for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Module:Languages
Wikimedia Commons requires also local mediawiki:lang/langcode pages for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Module:Languages
Nov 5 2019
@Reedy The date June 24, 2019 matches with your FlaggedRevs config rework but i didn't spot yet anything which would have broken the autopromote.
Nov 3 2019
Oct 25 2019
@Aklapper It is definitely something which is worked on so tagged WMFI to it.
Oct 13 2019
In T233561#5570753, @MBH wrote:@DannyS712 @Tgr @Zache I wrote a bot that reviews all edit sequences that was not reviewed due to this bug. I wrote it for ruwiki, but if you want, I can launch it for your wikis too, if your wikis grant "editor" flag to my bot.
Oct 11 2019
Would it help for debugging if we could replicate this in test2.wikipedia.org?
Oct 6 2019
AFAIK all Flaproblems what i have seen can be explained with settings from wmf-config/flaggedrevs.php is not loaded.
Oct 1 2019
In T233561#5537057, @Tgr wrote:I see all the groups I should be seeing (["checkuser", "sysop", "*", "user", "autoconfirmed"]).
The error message says The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Editors, Reviewers.
What it should say (and does if I load the page in incognito mode) is Administrators, Editors. So this does seem like an issue with site configuration being messed up occasionally.
I tried to check yesterday if the patrolling is working or not too, but there are not many wikis where wgUseRCPatrol and FlaggedRews are both enabled. Also when revision is manually reviewed then it will be patrolled too which will mask the problem.
In T233561#5537071, @Neolexx wrote:To the best of my knowledge en-wiki doesn't use FlaggedRevs extension (as a replacement for the native patrol mechanics). Compare
I made a small script for myself to see if the UI (javascript) code thinks that I am autoreviewed or not. Script colorifies the usarname on the top of the page and prints a list of the groups on the end of the page.
Sep 30 2019
@Reedy do you have any educated guess what is going on here?
Confirmed in fiwiki too (user Aulis Eskola is in 'editor' user group which have autoreview user right and his edit should have been automatically reviewed)
Sep 29 2019
Based on huwiki configuration I think special:unreviewedpages is allowed only for Administrators and Editors. Users with only autoreview right should see a permission denied error on Special:UnreviewedPages.
Sep 20 2019
pushing this little bit up. It would be nice to get goodfaith working.
Sep 17 2019
In T209224#5496088, @Halfak wrote:... We should instead look at the number of edits that need to be reviewed in order to catch most of the vandalism. Without something like ORES in place, this is really just a factor of the total number of edits. ...
Sep 16 2019
Sep 15 2019
I would amend the patch and edit the task description to include removing the redundant nys.
Sep 3 2019
@Reedy I think that we are happy that you are maintaining it and thank you for fixing the configuration.
Aug 31 2019
Hmm, problem may be just because 'ukwiki' => false is missing from wgFlaggedRevsOverride setting in InitialiseSettings.php ?
Aug 28 2019
seems to work, thanks
Aug 20 2019
https have error NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID
Aug 14 2019
Aug 7 2019
Yes, we removed the local bot flag from Xqbot and its edits are not automatically reviewed.
Aug 4 2019
@Samat Is there any comments from community to the results?
Jul 28 2019
Jul 26 2019
Jul 5 2019
Jul 4 2019
for sju, sjd, and rmf this will be already done in T226701.
In T226701#5304443, @Urbanecm wrote:@Yupik Are the two changes dependent on each other in some way?
Jun 27 2019
Reported again in fiwiki by three users. One commented also that mobile site was working better.
Jun 19 2019
In T222309#5265020, @Cparle wrote:
Jun 11 2019
now sms is added to beta commons config it works in captions in file info page. However it still doesn't work in upload wizard (missing in both: caption and description language selector)
Jun 8 2019
Also https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Revision_table is outdated
Jun 7 2019
(@Aklapper) if this is something which needs to be asked from WMF then from who or where it needs to be asked?
Jun 1 2019
@Zoranzoki21 Do NOT enable VisualEditor on those wikis. Enable on only in fi.wikibooks.org
May 30 2019
Hmm, code should be live in Commons. sms is still missing from user interface because language is not configured to commons.
May 28 2019
AFAIK. SDC captions are same thing than Wikibase labels. It would be good thing if supported languages for monolingual texts and terms would be same. Terms = captions, labels, descriptions, aliases.
Also related to that is there some reason why moratoira cannot be removed as RFC by @Dereckson was closed without resolution and biggest voiced reason for it in first place was that nobody actually did enabling?
So if we do not want to use wmgExtraLanguageNames for SDC (per T222309#5156677) then it needs to be fixed in code too?
May 25 2019
Let's check if I have understood the system correctly @Nikerabbit