Wed, Mar 24
OK - no problem - if it is complicated, than I just drop that idea to simplify interface for them. Tnx for elaboration.
Mon, Mar 22
OK - I am having 35 young (TikTok and Instagram) students on Friday noon (CEST +2) introduced to Wikipedia and Wikimedia, so that would be tight but in time. Anyway ...
I think you can enable it and we call in others to join and you to disable if it becomes too much too quickly.
@GregorB would you join?
Sun, Mar 21
Fri, Mar 19
Thank you for the clarification.
I will ask others on village pump and personally to join the list of
Thu, Mar 18
(sorry for delays - crazy weeks here)
Mar 4 2021
Hi folx - is it possible to test use this on HR Wikipedia without full translation? Most younger Croatians actually only know English terminology of interfaces as very few apps are translated and localized anyway. I would like to try to show it to a few I plan to work with. Best Z
Nov 13 2020
I know tech people will not love this question, but access, sustainability and low-resource enthusiasts in me would love to ask:
Oct 24 2020
At the moment there is a bit of discussion on the mailing list
but based on words used I am not convinced it will move beyond usual chicken-and-egg discussion of software adoption :-/
Oct 23 2020
That could work but I can imagine it also per bigger project or bigger event. Personally would love that WikiSpore gets its own *(so that tech and content discussions can be decoupled), but even more urgent is 2030 Movement strategy events which is now recommending TELEGRAM group as one and only channel of communication *(#veryBadCHOICE) :-/
Oct 12 2020
...or just display first results for that spore and then for others also if any.
Not until we pick up the momentum a bit I hope.
Oct 1 2020
Hm...OK - I am starting to understand the problem.
Sep 30 2020
If we would be to move content from namespaces of individual spores into Main space - would that be solution (and default setup)?
Aug 29 2020
Aug 3 2020
Pardon if it sounded harsh. I just saw few questions not answered and no
new developments...should have narrowed it down to that.
Aug 1 2020
I can live with that for now as QRpedia seem to be dormant.
Jul 19 2020
Jul 18 2020
Jul 17 2020
Hi! I am doing coordination and organizing work in few (1 2 3 4 5 projects that could benefit from project management services for task listing and organizing. I would also want to start new projects on phabricator that are focused on interface and organization.
@Aklapper I have some time to work on this in near future, but I would also need some help to figure out how to start a project and have a workboard...last time I tried it looked like I can not have that with my type of account. Can I get more privileges to be able to initiate project and open workboard for it so this can be moved?
Jul 6 2020
Fingers crossed it stays that way. thank you!
Jun 17 2020
Jun 16 2020
Great. Looking forward to no longer looking into those blurry and psychedelic patterns with letters testing me if I was a bot. For sure I am a frustrated human with each new failed test.
Jun 14 2020
So will it get removed or we need to vote on this? Can we do it on next meeting in few hours? :-)
Jun 13 2020
Hey all - I want this proposal to advance in July. Anyone willing to help me get to Meta or elsewhere and get some visibility?
@Tgr should I remove this RfC?
@Pharos - could you do those 3 this weekend?
I want to start promoting it...without that URL looks just too hard to memorize.
Jun 6 2020
thats good enough :-)
for Queer and Sport Spore also ;-p
I saw you used subdomains for Wikispore.org
No. I think it works just as forwarding - correct @Pharos ?
Jun 5 2020
I am. They do show up. Please do remove them. Feel like my time answering them is stolen.
May 31 2020
May 30 2020
May 14 2020
May 11 2020
Changes made. Thank you for input!
I updated the name to be inclusive of all WikiMedia and not just WikiPedia
May 10 2020
Yes, I agree. Please add if you can.
It can be, but does not have to be. It is not scheduled yet. I have flexibility today, but no idea in which timezones are people who expressed interest, so I would suggest that I remain available for later part of the day for me (+2 Central European Time here), so basically from 6 to 12hours from now and rest of you voice your preference *(depending on timezone and availability)...
OK? *(or there is a better way to do this)
May 9 2020
I did not fix it yet, but I am flexible and free to do it any reasonable
time tomorrow 12-24 hours from now.
Do you have suggestion when?
I can see rationality behind your comment. I would for sure not expect that something is fully developed and finished as a regular working code, but this Request for Comment is really just a request for people to express interest and comment on what could be done so that a proposal could start articulation collectively by people who have hacking as a focus, rather then just people who have policy focus. Does that make any sense?