Oups sorry for not answering this before as I just saw it now...

OK - no problem - if it is complicated, than I just drop that idea to simplify interface for them. Tnx for elaboration.

In T275684#6937888, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

In T275684#6935995, @Zblace wrote:

One thing that I could imagine to quickly simplify landing page is to remove Central Notice for new users. Now it displays CEE Spring 2021 campaign for which I work and will I will mention, but it should not be there adding complexity to page where UI and content are almost the same.

I'm not sure how we can help there.
You can edit Mediawiki:growth-homepage-banner to display a banner at the top of the homepage, redirecting to CEE spring 2021 campaign...?

OK - I am having 35 young (TikTok and Instagram) students on Friday noon (CEST +2) introduced to Wikipedia and Wikimedia, so that would be tight but in time. Anyway ...

I think you can enable it and we call in others to join and you to disable if it becomes too much too quickly.

@GregorB would you join?

In T275684#6928327, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

We have one video about suggested edits. We made some minor chances, but the overall principle is the same.

@Ponor and I registered as mentors, but my interface still does not display Metntorship module. @Urbanecm_WMF can you chech if all is in place correctly?

Thank you for the clarification.
I will ask others on village pump and personally to join the list of
mentors.

(sorry for delays - crazy weeks here)

Hi folx - is it possible to test use this on HR Wikipedia without full translation? Most younger Croatians actually only know English terminology of interfaces as very few apps are translated and localized anyway. I would like to try to show it to a few I plan to work with. Best Z

I know tech people will not love this question, but access, sustainability and low-resource enthusiasts in me would love to ask:

Hi!
At the moment there is a bit of discussion on the mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-October/095811.html
but based on words used I am not convinced it will move beyond usual chicken-and-egg discussion of software adoption :-/

That could work but I can imagine it also per bigger project or bigger event. Personally would love that WikiSpore gets its own *(so that tech and content discussions can be decoupled), but even more urgent is 2030 Movement strategy events which is now recommending TELEGRAM group as one and only channel of communication *(#veryBadCHOICE) :-/

...or just display first results for that spore and then for others also if any.

Not until we pick up the momentum a bit I hope.

Hm...OK - I am starting to understand the problem.

If we would be to move content from namespaces of individual spores into Main space - would that be solution (and default setup)?

Pardon if it sounded harsh. I just saw few questions not answered and no
new developments...should have narrowed it down to that.

I can live with that for now as QRpedia seem to be dormant.

In T258317#6316675, @RhinosF1 wrote:

I think you might be assuming both the technical knowledge and technical overview of how WMF infrastructure works that I do not have.

It's the whole community process as well.

In T258317#6316669, @RhinosF1 wrote:

In T258317#6316668, @Zblace wrote:

In T258317#6316665, @RhinosF1 wrote:

I do not see how this would be informed discussion on Meta if there is no way for all to test use it?

Then I guess you're asking for a Cloud-VPS project?

I have no good overview of infrastructure options, but sure - yes.

Tagged it as such. Please see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/view/2875/ and update the task with the information it lists as needed.

In T258317#6316667, @RhinosF1 wrote:

In T258317#6316666, @Zblace wrote:

In T258317#6316662, @RhinosF1 wrote:

@Zblace: why is this tagged with Cloud-VPS and Service requests? It's one or the other.

I could not really tell which and how *as I noted at the end of my proposal)...

Well, Is it a volunteer managed VPS running on cloud services infra you want or something part of WMF Production?

In T258317#6316665, @RhinosF1 wrote:

I do not see how this would be informed discussion on Meta if there is no way for all to test use it?

Then I guess you're asking for a Cloud-VPS project?

In T258317#6316662, @RhinosF1 wrote:

@Zblace: why is this tagged with Cloud-VPS and Service requests? It's one or the other.

In T258317#6316658, @RhinosF1 wrote:

Neither do I think Phabricator is the place to discuss this.
Maybe meta?

Hi! I am doing coordination and organizing work in few (1 2 3 4 5 projects that could benefit from project management services for task listing and organizing. I would also want to start new projects on phabricator that are focused on interface and organization.

@Aklapper I have some time to work on this in near future, but I would also need some help to figure out how to start a project and have a workboard...last time I tried it looked like I can not have that with my type of account. Can I get more privileges to be able to initiate project and open workboard for it so this can be moved?

Fingers crossed it stays that way. thank you!

Great. Looking forward to no longer looking into those blurry and psychedelic patterns with letters testing me if I was a bot. For sure I am a frustrated human with each new failed test.

So will it get removed or we need to vote on this? Can we do it on next meeting in few hours? :-)

Hey all - I want this proposal to advance in July. Anyone willing to help me get to Meta or elsewhere and get some visibility?

@Tgr should I remove this RfC?

@Pharos - could you do those 3 this weekend?
I want to start promoting it...without that URL looks just too hard to memorize.

thats good enough :-)
for Queer and Sport Spore also ;-p

I saw you used subdomains for Wikispore.org

No. I think it works just as forwarding - correct @Pharos ?

I am. They do show up. Please do remove them. Feel like my time answering them is stolen.

I agree

In T252291#6137806, @Bluerasberry wrote:

This is a similar project.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_health_initiative/User_reporting_system

Changes made. Thank you for input!

I updated the name to be inclusive of all WikiMedia and not just WikiPedia
projects.

Yes, I agree. Please add if you can.

It can be, but does not have to be. It is not scheduled yet. I have flexibility today, but no idea in which timezones are people who expressed interest, so I would suggest that I remain available for later part of the day for me (+2 Central European Time here), so basically from 6 to 12hours from now and rest of you voice your preference *(depending on timezone and availability)...
@Aklapper
@Bawolff
@Denny
@Salgo60
OK? *(or there is a better way to do this)

I did not fix it yet, but I am flexible and free to do it any reasonable
time tomorrow 12-24 hours from now.
Do you have suggestion when?

I can see rationality behind your comment. I would for sure not expect that something is fully developed and finished as a regular working code, but this Request for Comment is really just a request for people to express interest and comment on what could be done so that a proposal could start articulation collectively by people who have hacking as a focus, rather then just people who have policy focus. Does that make any sense?
@Bawolff