Patch merged. It can still take a couple of days until it reaches the WMF projects (MediaWiki train).

That was quick, thanks!

In the meanwhile, rEWMA unsuppressCrossWiki.php can be used to remove those local blocks (when it is not feasible to do so manually).

+ Platform Engineering per https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers. Apparently CPT/PE are the code stewards for Scribunto, so tagging them here. The individual reviewers/maintainers listed on that mediawiki page have not commented on the patch.

@Dzahn Searching through my inbox, the first occurence of phab.wiki is from 2019, so it has been around for a short while. I thought it was a WMF domain as around those dates w.wiki started operating too. Thanks for taking a look.

I support the idea.

Sorry for the late reply. Mi client is gmail web interface and his was
Yahoo. The mail with the weird encoding was however received from
lists.wikimedia.org on my gmail account, upon unsubscribing him. Thanks.--
M. A.

Reverted in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/mediawiki-config/+/726950/

The change is being reverted due to performance issues.

Done. Please note that it won't take effect immediatelly as the parser cache needs to expire in order for the new dynamic maps to appear. Please let the wiki do so automatically. Best regards.

Done. Please let me know if it is working as intended. Regards.

I think the above patch will make eswiki behave like Commons with regards to Maps. I'm tagging Maps here so they can review both Task and Patch. Thanks in advance.

Hello @akosiaris. The whole subscriber/account name is a random
sequence of letters and symbols, not only the "redacted" part. I've
forwarded the email I got to you. I hope that makes things more clear.
Best regards.

In T286513#7207021, @Urbanecm wrote:

Which kind of revisions are in scope? Only revdelled ones? Or also fully deleted?

Noting that the community authorized only granting local oversighters the ability to view deleted edits/revisions (which is just deletedtext) (lit.: ¿Debe permitirse a los supresores ver ediciones marcadas como borradas? transl.: Shall we let oversighters to see deleted edits?). The other permissions where not voted/mentioned and should not be added, especially after the technical insuficiency of the proposal was raised and was not acted upon (the previous wording of the vote which proposed bulk adding all required deletion and block-related permissions to make the group self-sufficient was never adopted and its scope narrowed just to "see deleted edits"). Thanks.

I made a patch to rename the namespace and keep the old name as well to avoid broken pages/links, but I'm not sure that'd work.

Before the error I get the following warning:

As far as I can see the above patch was included in MW-1.37-notes (1.37.0-wmf.9; 2021-06-07) and is scheduled to land on tvywiki on Thursday, June 10, 2021.

@Jdforrester-WMF May I ask, why isn't ReleaseTaggerBot tagging this merged core change? Thanks.

T160666 might be of interest.

In T284241#7136274, @Leaderboard wrote:

In T284241#7132994, @MarcoAurelio wrote:

I think rMW maintenance/reassignEdits.php can be used to do this, but I've never seen this being used on Wikimedia.

Does it mean that the IP can start contributing using their SUL account, because the script appears to be simply "renaming" the edits and not doing anything to the account per se?

I think this needs to happen over rMW languages/messages/MessagesTyv.php so all MediaWiki wikis running out there benefit from the fix.

I've also included the associated Book talk namespace in the above patch.

I think rMW maintenance/reassignEdits.php can be used to do this, but I've never seen this being used on Wikimedia.

Given how scarcely the permission is used, and that there has been abuse from autoconfirmed users as well, I think it'd be best if for now we removed applychangetags and changetags from the user group, and granted them instead to the bot and sysop groups only.

In T284182#7130997, @Ladsgroup wrote:

So to recap the problem is that you set to hold all WMF emails but overrode it per case using non-members.

Is it possible to keep controlling the bot from freenode and make stewardbots just report events to libera for now? Channel access lists are not very reliable for now IMHO. I'd wait until wikimedia cloaks are available so we can know who's who.

Big +1 to this.

@Tgr This happened to me some days ago, but in my case the email addresses where identical (that is, I got twice subscribed to listadmins-l with the same address and attemps to fix it via the UI where futile, the same error messages as you got were displayed to me).

Thanks for your comments. Indeed there's no dropdown to select in which language you'd like to see the UI in. In my case, the translations shown to me are sometimes not good or accurate, and in some others they're missing strings. I'd rather see the interface in its source language (English), but there's no way users can chose right now. Thanks for making a comment on the task upstream.