I think it's a good practice to put a template layer between the module API and the the article, it brings much flexibility. Not adding it in the VE default layout might actually be presented as a "feature not a bug". Not bothering article writers with too much technical complexity is great.
Mon, Sep 24
Sat, Sep 22
Hi @Aklapper, is there something more I should do to make this ticket go forward?
Thu, Sep 20
I re-open the task, as from my understanding of the documentation this is a legit action from my part as the task creator, all the more when questions are pending.
Hi @Lydia_Pintscher , I join your concern on not wasting valuable resources.
As an example of the limits perceived with our current infrastructure, even staying in the frame of a single Wiktionary, you can think about creating glossaries using existing definitions.
Wed, Sep 19
So to answer a few questions I received in feedback to this ticket:
Tue, Sep 18
Fri, Sep 7
Aug 15 2018
In a first time, I mean on fr.wikitionary, as I'm prototyping data separation from displaying layer there. If that happen to work well, we can see with other wiktionaries later, does that make sense.
Aug 13 2018
Aug 10 2018
Clicking the link toward https://riot.im/app/#/room/#mediawiki-general:matrix.org respond me that the channel doesn't exists. Maybe I need some additional configuration though. I already accepted a spontaneous request by Freenode to join what I guess was a bridge, maybe on my laptop client (Fractal), but I guess that anyway it's synchronized in the browser client and it's not the problem.
Aug 8 2018
On the Wikisource global community telegram group, there was a suggestion to create a Meta page to coordinate this efforts. So that should be something to do. :)
Aug 6 2018
Possibly related tickets:
Hi @Pintoch if a license is compatible with CC0 requirements, then yes it can be imported into any dataset covered by CC0, including Wikidata.
Jul 12 2018
Jun 2 2018
For some reason @Aklapper is on most task I create (I guess for triage reasons) but not on this one. Please let me know if I should or not add you manually in that kind of case.
I looked at the Probox documentation but didn't saw anything related to the "join" button and the role list.
The list of activity is given on Commons:
I set up the probox template
So either someone already skilled on this installation process should claim/be-assigned this task, or it will wait that I can have time to read the documentation, and possibly get sufficient privileges on corresponding targeted wikis.
Hi @Denny any news regarding this? What's your mind concerning my additional more precise questions on lexical data?
May 27 2018
May 25 2018
May 23 2018
Sorry, I've been busy on other activities lately, I'll catch up and give feed back as soon as I can.
May 19 2018
To give more context, the goal would be to enable archiving this discussion on Meta, where the license is a requirement.
May 18 2018
Seems that https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Probox is exacltly what we need :)
I just endorsed a project on Meta with a button which already do what we should aim: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Rapid/UG_ELiSo/Outreach_leaflets_2018
May 14 2018
Hi @Denny, here are a small set questions that are hopefully simple and concrete:
May 13 2018
T115691 have something about the white line
@Ivanhercaz any news on this?
May 12 2018
May 8 2018
Also I think that if we want to really expand our community outside Europe and North America, it would be important to provide an infrastructure that ease contribution and reuse without too much legal concerns in places where we expect to make serious outreach to improve our community diversity.
Thank you @Tgr for bringing more clarification through distinction in the discussion. (also I'm not sure if thanks messages are welcome on phabricator tickets, but on the other hand I see no way to "thank" an individual answer…
May 7 2018
For 3. we might promote it in a different manner that don't limit the topic to Valentine day, but also other day of love. Actually, we could turn it to "day dedicated to love".
We could have also
Book covers is tricky, we have to be sure the book cover is not a ongoing copyrighted material. But >100 books are probably ok. So I would say, we promote that as "cover of ancient books related to love" and we give more information in details:)
Whatever list we come from at the end, I think we should keep one or two extra "yet to determine" categories in mind, and take care to have resource for prizes on it. We don't really what to expect, so it's better if we can give ourself a bit of flexibility.
May 5 2018
The current indication to edit this section would no work anymore if the section is just moved to the subpage, at minimun, the link that invite to edit the support section should be changed.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ivanhercaz/Tests seems perfect to me as far as the appearance goes, than you @Ivanhercaz we only need to add the functional part edit the page, possibly first checking if user is logged.
Until we have a wll at wikimedia dot org or something like that, @Wikilover90 created wikiloveslove at gmail dot com
I think that before we launch that, it would be better to have a simple "support" blue button, that directly edit the page, without requiring to type any wikitext.
I started something on the second point, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Love/Appreciation
May 4 2018
The second point is purely about writing some promotional, isn't it?
Ok. So far I thanked people who signed the support section on Meta through the Mediawiki "thank" feature.
May 3 2018
I'm not sure to understand the exact feature exposed here.