Hi! @Balaji030698 Thank you for that

@ArielGlenn thanks for the review, will have a look now.

Ok thanks

Hi @ArielGlenn I am interested in this project for GSoC 2018 and currently looking at a few micro tasks. Thanks

@RazeSoldier You can go ahead

can I take this task please?

That's a nice idea. I will like to contribute. When you are set could you please share on our mailing list this idea and necessary resources to contribute.

@D3r1ck01 yes and please have a look at the new patch

@Yaron_Koren Sorry then! I will unassigned myself

@Yaron_Koren , looking at @yashdeep97 comment on this task T187115, I found the same piece of code in CargoAutocompleteAPI.php:32. Does it mean this task is invalid as well?

Start by setting up Mediawiki locally. This is a tutorial for that .
If I am not mistaking, the bug is in the Skin extension. Clone the extension as well.
Then work on fixing the bug. In case of any problem you will have quicker replies on IRC. (#wikimedia-dev, #wikimedia-tech). But you can also leave them on the ticket.

@samuelguebo I wish to work on this if you are no more on it. Thanks :)

Hello, @srishakatux , @Parent5446 , @01tonythomas, I wish to work on this for the upcoming GSOC round. Adding some few microtasks will help. I hope its not too early . I prefer to maximize my chances :).

@BamLifa are you on this or can I assign myself and work on it?

@Eugene233 , @D3r1ck01 what do you think of editing on both en WP and fr WP as there is a high probability of having bilingual people or even people from a french background at the event. remember Cameroon is bilingual :)

I think that's a good Idea

I will mentor this for GCI/17

ok thanks @D3r1ck01

@Huji Please could you mention the directory or file that holds the function you mentioned?

Thank you. seen. Sorry the first email on my profile had a typo

@Florian I have't seen the email till now. PLease could you resend the email?

I will mentor this for Google-Code-in-2017

@D3r1ck01, based on the discussion we had earlier today online, I have made the changes you asked me to. The rest will be done by you :).

@Niharika, will submit a micro task done ASAP. @Sumit, Thanks so much for the reminder.

@Reedy, thats correct. Its makes sense, meaning the previous code was ok. So the send() method called in sendWithPear() in this case is that of Mail_smtp which is true. Thanks @01tonythomas, meaning we just have to update the documention for the code so we specify that $mailer is using Mail_smtp send() method. Is that right @Reedy, @01tonythomas ?

But @01tonythomas, the send() method has been defined there meaning if $mailer is calling that method, then its using the definition of the send() defined. I don't know whether i am making some sense though or is the send() defined in the UserMailer.php file suppose to somehow override the PEAR send() method?

@Parent5446, thanks for the votecat :)