According to their blogpost (https://www.elastic.co/blog/licensing-change):
Starting with the upcoming Elastic 7.11 release, we will be moving the Apache 2.0-licensed code of Elasticsearch and Kibana to be dual licensed under SSPL and the Elastic License, giving users the choice of which license to apply.
Their FAQ on 2021 License Change : https://www.elastic.co/pricing/faq/licensing
Considering this is happening:
- WIll CirrusSearch rely on ElasticSearch in the near future (say on version 7.x)?
- Will CirrusSearch rely on ElasticSearch in long-term?
- According to task T213996, the switch from MongoDB had happened because it was removed in Debian and therefore will be unsuitable for long-term use., and therefore it was unclear if a precedent was achieved. Are there any policy change or clarification if another dependency announced to switch to a license that may not be suitable for MediaWiki?
Context on proprietary relicensing:
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2020/jan/06/copyleft-equality/
Existing alternative venues:
https://opendistro.github.io/for-elasticsearch/contribute.html ("distribution" or "fork" depending who you ask, no CLA)
Some announced forks:
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/opensource/stepping-up-for-a-truly-open-source-elasticsearch/
https://logz.io/blog/open-source-elasticsearch-doubling-down/