In T246734#6068676, @Daimona wrote:

In T246734#6068608, @Riley_Huntley wrote:

In T246734#6056691, @Aklapper wrote:

@Daimona: Interesting, thanks! I had only found https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_sysops#Permissions mentioning AbuseFilter filter modifications but had not known about the Abuse Filter maintainer group. I now wrote If your wiki has no local sysops, then you can contact the [[meta:Abuse filter maintainer|global Abuse filter maintainer group]] for help, or [[meta:Global sysops|global sysops]].

See https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAKlapper_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox%2FT246734&type=revision&diff=3778816&oldid=3772321

Neither abuse filter maintainers nor global sysops can create abuse filters locally; they can only modify them.

Is it explicit in the policy of GS? For AFM, at least, I don't see anything against creating new filters, if the local community wishes so.

In T246734#6056691, @Aklapper wrote:

@Daimona: Interesting, thanks! I had only found https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_sysops#Permissions mentioning AbuseFilter filter modifications but had not known about the Abuse Filter maintainer group. I now wrote If your wiki has no local sysops, then you can contact the [[meta:Abuse filter maintainer|global Abuse filter maintainer group]] for help, or [[meta:Global sysops|global sysops]].

See https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAKlapper_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox%2FT246734&type=revision&diff=3778816&oldid=3772321

In T249402#6028888, @Aklapper wrote:

@Riley_Huntley: Is there a canonical way (e.g. a category name) on Commons to identify images/content as "not safe"?

Has this been recently discussed in the Commons community and has there been feedback that such a "safe search" is actually wanted (link to discussion)?
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/Safesearch for previous conversations.

Agree

In T248931#6013490, @Aklapper wrote:

Which web browser is this about? Chrome/Chromium has quite aggressive caching. Can you also see this behavior in another web browser?

Now showing for me. I changed 15 other sidebars around the same time, and the others reflected their changes long before this one.

In T248931#6013106, @Reedy wrote:

Looks fine to me...?

In T244577#5859871, @Ammarpad wrote:

The 'other projects' box does not look great on mobile. By default part of the content is cut and hidden in the box and needs repeated horizontal scrolling to be able to read each project item

In T244577#5859871, @Ammarpad wrote:

The 'other projects' box does not look great on mobile. By default part of the content is cut and hidden in the box and needs repeated horizontal scrolling to be able to read each project item

In T242672#5799705, @DannyS712 wrote:

WP is an alias, not a psuedo-namespace

Consensus has been determined to launch partial block on Commons per a successful request for comment.

@TBolliger Any comment in response to Danny's above suggestion? Sounds like blocking someone from moving a page is a simpler option to build in, similar to the block email option, and wouldn't require a database change.

Unable to use delete.py on Commons due to this error

Have over 100 files to re-upload to suppress personal information in the original version, however, I cannot re-upload due to the duplication warning that cannot be bypassed.

Please note that the file linked above is not a file requiring revision deletion - it is merely an example.

It appears my oauth (wikimedia account ~riley) is connected to a toolforge account, but neither Riley or Riley Huntley.

+1 this request.

In T212661#4845023, @Peachey88 wrote:

Works for me, On the error message, you needed to scroll down and hit "Upload anyway, ignore warnings" (or similar wordings).

I suspect it was triggered by "A file identical to this file (File:First aid 19.jpg) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's aid 19.jpg deletion history. If you disagree with the reason for deletion, please make an undeletion request instead of re-uploading."

In T212661#4845180, @Aklapper wrote:

@Riley_Huntley: Can you confirm Peachey88's assumption? Did you see a ""A file identical to this file has previously been deleted" message?

This error is not encountered while using PAWS on Firefox

You can question my thinking for putting syntax in my name too.

This is a large mistake on my part, I made this edit in relation to a request at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Upload&oldid=196564207

This was an edit request related to how Commons has switched several mediawiki pages over to 4.0 as the preferred option, including the legal footer bar. It was run by legal previously, would have to dig back to find that.

In the case where override was requested, there was no actual image on the page, just a text page in the file namespace. We just want to move the page (and the text), no images.

The work around did not work for me. I attempted to login to the effected wiki and caught the exception page.

In T134460#2283877, @JEumerus wrote:

Presumably, to create a way to override that block.

Well thats a record.. 32 images in a row that I could not delete.

Still experiencing...

A database query error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jfdg_hfhu_pprsdrsd_gegjg.webm Exception encountered, of type "LocalFileLockError"

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2_Kenny_Oude_kleedkamerd.png&action=delete
Exception encountered, of type "LocalFileLockError"

@Pokefan95 As you prioritized this task, do you plan to work on this task? If yes, please also claim the task by setting yourself as assignee. You are not a developer, and we have a bugwrangler to manage prioritizing tasks.

@Pokefan95 As you prioritized this task, do you plan to work on this task? If yes, please also claim the task by setting yourself as assignee. You are not a developer, and we have a bugwrangler to manage prioritizing tasks.

We are still experiencing this issue.

Exception encountered, of type "Exception"

@Aklapper; This was originally proposed as a bot task in which I was interested in attempting. However, after other options proposed (extension), I am waiting to hear what others think the best option would be. Therefore it'd be inappropriate for me to claim this task without having the skills (if it were an extension) to complete it. If you disagree with the priority, by all means change it.