Task summary to be improved - please edit.
Improve initial quality of contributed patchsets and communicate expectations.
- Clean up / rewrite https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Code_review/Getting_reviews (e.g. contains "Gerrit limitations" section which is irrelevant for a patch author); keep as generic / infrastructure-independent as possible (Gerrit vs Differential)
- Incorporate author-related items from https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Code_review if appropriate
- Check https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Commit_message_guidelines (and keep generic if possible - updating the page once Differential has replaced Gerrit is T123081: Update Commit Message Guidelines for Differential)
- Potentially incorporate T121751: Document best practices to amend a change written by another contributor?
Intention: Improve the situation described in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:AKlapper_%28WMF%29/Code_Review#Poor_quality_of_contributors.27_patches (and to some extend https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:AKlapper_%28WMF%29/Code_Review#Workload_of_existing_reviewers )