Page MenuHomePhabricator
Search Advanced Search
Use the application-specific Advanced Search to set additional search criteria: Tasks, Commits. (More information)
    • Task
    [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:T6ukmc98uuun7ydc | Noé describes it well here ]]. The TL;DR is, make something ("Insert Quote/Attestation") similar to the Insert Media dialog, which looks for a certain word/sentence on sister projects like Wikisource, Wikiquote etc., allows to select the snippet where the word/sentence was found, and to have it added to the article as an quote/attestation of use with a link to the whole source document. Was also [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2017_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Wiktionary/Add_%22Insert_Attestation%22_to_VisualEditor | suggested during Community Wishlist Survey 2017 ]] and ends up with 32 supports vote.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    (Written by Sherry, as usual.) Also: update target list for wikis before delivery update translators list after delivery
    • Task
    Ziko says that he's using VE's Search function looking for the first time a certain word is mentioned, so that he can add a link to it. The green highlight color behind occurrences of the word makes it difficult to figure out whether the marked text is already linked or not, though. So can that color be changed to something different perhaps?
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    It even still mentions people who quit WMF a while ago. Starts at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/VisualEditor .
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I have a draft with very basic content, a few lines of text plus links. I am unable to paste that in VE (tried it in Chrome and Opera, private and public wikis alike): nothing happens after I do so, sometimes the Save button will be disabled, sometimes I won't be able to say because I didn't add anything to the page. Copy/pasting such content on, say, Gdocs, copying it again and pasting it in VE doesn't make a difference (assuming doing this made sense at all). If you're interested in digging into this, let me know, I can forward you this mail- it was meant for internal consumption, so this is all I can do.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    User:李4 reports: // In the visual editor, if I hold down Shift and then press the right arrow key, I'm able to select the text from left to right, just like any GUI text editor. However if I hold down Shift and then press the left arrow key, I'm unable to select the text from right to left: the cursor won't go past the current letter. [...] found it works with Firefox, but not with IE 11. My OS is Win7 Pro.//
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Building a "hub" of tech-savvy and keen community members who could help their wikimedian fellows all over the world to get the same rewarding visual editor experience they have. This task is about https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:VisualEditor/VE_as_the_main_editor . //The second phase is about checking with these people what worked for them. Did they use existing documentation, or are there gaps in it we need to take care of? Did they create additional documentation to help themselves and others? (If so, we'll want to list those resources.) Did they perhaps seek help from someone else as well? The existing checklist will be scrutinized at this point. The third phase may be about actually covering gaps (especially documentation ones. I don't think we have learning patterns docs about VE, for example, and that's something we may consider creating).//
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    When the last editor used is WT, I expect the section edit links to also say "Edit source", just like the top one for the page does. If this is intentional, it's confusing: I didn't know what to expect when I clicked on one of those links.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Sfn is supposed to be placed right next to the sentence you want to reference. For some reason though when adding it unwanted lines are added as well, so that it looks [[ https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%B8%AD%E5%8E%9F%E4%B8%AD%E4%B9%9F&diff=60014805&oldid=59977040 | like this ]], rather than [[ https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:VisualEditor_sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=60018596 | like this ]]. This seems to happen at en.wp and at ja.wp as well (where the issue was reported). I'm not familiar enough with the template to find out why sometimes I manage to [[ https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:VisualEditor_sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=60018596 | add it correctly ]], and sometimes [[ https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help%3AVisualEditor_sandbox&type=revision&diff=60018810&oldid=60018596 | I don't ]] (same browser, OS, page etc.). I can say that even when it's added correctly, it will look "wrong" on the page, but it will show up fine both while reviewing changes and saving.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    (I had reported this [[ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136421#2334512 | previously ]] as well, but it probably deserves a separate task.) At zh-yue, setting is Remember my last editor, I launch VE, then start hitting Special:Random. Click on Edit, VE launches, hit Special:Random again (without closing VE). Sometimes it takes a few attempts, sometimes it take multiple tries, but in the end I'll always land on some article which will show me "Edit source" rather than Edit (and I obviously haven't switched). I do not see a warning message. The above is how I manage to reproduce the behaviour. I have no idea if this also occurs while editing more "regularly". As of July 2017, looks like the same thing, or a very similar one, is reported at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Ttle85qn8vj8o9ml for pa.wp . However, because not many details are provided, and I can't reproduce any of that, I don't know that we can diagnose anything here.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    The original purpose of this task was to request that //meta//-E///meta//-V worked as shortcuts to switch editors while editing a page. However, a few days later, looks like these 2 shortcuts are already providing such a switch functionality. The problem is that [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Keyboard_shortcuts#MediaWiki_shortcuts | WT users expect that hitting meta//-V while editing triggers the "Show changes" action ]] instead. I do not have a suggestion for a better key. See also T54701 and T26977.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Cleared prefs to test. I'm in Chrome latest version, Win8. 1) Edited my user page. Chose "Use the editor I chose last". 2) Saved the edit. 3) Edited that page again. 4) The editing tabs dialog popped-up again (flashing, twice). Seen at en.wiki and test2 as well.
    • Task
    This probably doesn't belong here, but even if it gets closed it's probably easier to find this info here than on wiki. On en.wp and ja.wp, in a "remember my last editor" setting (not sure elsewhere), if the gadget "Add an [edit] link for the lead section of a page" is enabled, clicking on the resulting link may cause: 1) the page to load, but the focus is actually at the bottom of it (can be seen better in long articles) 2) the loaded editor to be WT or VE without any apparent reason why it should be one or the other (repeated tests via Special:Random have shown that, starting with VE as the default editor, it will launch it for several times in a row, then open WT out of the blue and keep opening the following ones in WT. At en.wp it seems like BLPs always start in WT, but it can also happen randomly as well.)
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    On any Wikipedia (including SET when "show both editor tabs" is the chosen editing preference), any browser AFAICT (I'm reproducing in Win8): 1) hit the "Edit" link for a section; 2) VE loads correctly. Now hit the Back button in the browser; 3) hit that "Edit" link again; 4) observe that VE doesn't load (progress bar is complete, but nothing happens). Console says "Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property '0' of undefined". Reported by [[ https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E3%83%90%E3%82%B0%E3%81%AE%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A#.E5.85.88.E6.97.A5.E5.B0.8E.E5.85.A5.E3.81.95.E3.82.8C.E3.81.9F.E3.83.93.E3.82.B8.E3.83.A5.E3.82.A2.E3.83.AB.E3.82.A8.E3.83.87.E3.82.A3.E3.82.BF.E3.81.AE.E4.B8.8D.E5.85.B7.E5.90.88.E3.81.AB.E3.81.A4.E3.81.84.E3.81.A6 | editors at ja.wiki ]].
    • Task
    (Feel free to improve the title. I'm just reporting from de.wiki:) How to reproduce: *go to some article in which the current version is not sighted *make an edit to the article using Visual Editor, set checkmark to the option //Sichte die letzten Änderungen// and save the edit *now the message appears: //1 Änderung dieser Version ist noch nicht gesichtet//. with the diff from the last sighted to the new current version and with the button Sichten at the bottom of the page. (There should be a button //Entsichten//) *when you look at the article history (in a new browser tab) you can see that the new current version is sighted, but the second most recent version is left not sighted (well done) *click the button //Sichten// *now the second most recent version is sighted too, although we haven't seen the diff to this version, but to the new current version. And there is no need to sight the second last version. --Diwas, 00:35, 9. Mai 2016 (CEST)
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Take a long-ish article - Obama, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_metal, you choose. Try and re-use a reference. Here's what I observed -albeit sporadically: 1) it takes a lot for the Cite menu to even come up; 2) after searching for a reference to re-use, click on it: it isn't added to the article, and you can't go past the search results; 3) clicking on Cancel also doesn't seem to accomplish any effect. After point 2 in a different attempt I tried to click on a random link on the page - that worked, in that the dialog disappeared and the reference was where I meant to place it. Another user says they [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback#Slow.2Funresponsive_script_error_when_generating_citations | get a warning from Firefox about a script being slow/unresponsive while trying to add a citation ]].
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I'm editing [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&oldid=719486829&veaction=edit | a revision of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama ]]. I'm curious to see if typing a number in Cite's Re-use search box brings up a reference with that number. It does, but other references also appear which don't seem to contain that number anywhere. For example, when typing "180", references numbered 119, 176, 180 and 188 appear as a result. 180 is the match; by looking at the code, 176 has the number "180" in its URL; but I can't figure out what the other 2 have to do with it.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    When we centralized feedback months ago [[ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92661#1937634 | we should have included hi.wiki ]] (since the feedback page there has never received any feedback, and comments about the upcoming rollout, whenever that happens, can certainly be handled elsewhere). Let's do that now then.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Send out communications, in as many languages as possible, about this change. [x] Wiki families: [x] Wikipedias [x] English [x] German [x] All others [x] Wikitionaries [x] Wikiquotes [x] Wikibookses [x] Wikisources [x] Wikiversities [x] Wikivoyages [x] Single wikis: [x] Wikispecies [x] Wikidata [x] MediaWiki [x] Wikimedia Commons [x] Meta Wiki [x] Incubator wiki [x] Wikimedia Foundation wiki [ ] Final follow-up with wikis and checking Note: Not doing for Wikinewses (if and only if they make necessary local custom changes to legal text) or for private wikis.
    • Task
    Don't be SHY! (sorry for the joke). German-speaking editors have requested the ability to add a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_hyphen in VE. They use it within those typically super-long word compounds like //Donau­dampf­schifffahrts­gesell­schafts­schiff//: example in [[ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilfe:Bilder#Legende_bei_schmalen_Bildern | documentation for picture captions ]] - [[ https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bahnhof_des_Jahres&action=edit&section=1 | example for long words inside tables ]] (//"Look at the word „Großstadtbahnhof“ in Bahnhof des Jahres for example, which will be written as one word as long as there's enough space, but broken into two if necessary due to size limitations."//). I'll leave it to you (probably to Design people, actually) to figure out if this should be possible by typing or via the special characters menu. I thought pasting could work, but it doesn't.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    During the last months, several announcements have been delivered there about the upcoming deployment of the visual editor. After soliciting feedback for months, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T109818 was resolved. The last round of feedback (from en.wp editors who know Japanese) has also been positive. I posted several notes to "village pumps" and users' talk pages last week. The main announcement, which includes instructions about the single edit tab system, has been translated.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I made this test a while ago in an incognito window: edited a page in WT while logged-out; created an account; was prompted to edit in VE. The SET system is supposed to remember my last editor.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Szy313q2d8mhhoue | Per @Pompilos ]]: > Hi. Visual editor include a poor version of Greek alphabet, able to write only modern Greek (monotonic alphabet), but not classical Greek, because it lacks polytonic characters. Can anyone add the lacking characters? They can be seen [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_diacritics#Computer_encoding|here]].
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:VisualEditor/VE_as_the_main_editor . At the end of the day, when the visual editor is fully developed, it is still not useful as it should be until the "community side" of the work, detailed at the page above, has started on each wiki. Can we build a "hub" of tech-savvy and keen community members who could help their wikimedian fellows all over the world to get the same rewarding visual editor experience they have? What we know: *smaller communities have capacity problems; *volunteers never spare themselves when they figure out what a problem is and what the steps are to fix it. "If you build it, they will come": if we give them good starting points, they'll build awesomeness on those. At some point, I will no longer be involved in VisualEditor work. Before then, I must make sure communities have the "tools" they need. I feel that this task is strongly tied to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration/Strategy#How_we_succeed . **Plan:** Phase 0: improving the current checklist page, and making room for "expert" names. First phase is "just" about **getting people to list themselves**. It involves finding them with on-wiki and mailing lists communications. I'd like everyone to add themselves to every category that applies. It will start by the end of June. Page created at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:VisualEditor/Community_Taskforce . **Jul-Sep goal: **The second phase is about **checking with these people what worked for them**. Did they use existing documentation, or are there gaps in it we need to take care of? Did they create additional documentation to help themselves and others? (If so, we'll want to **list those resources**.) Did they perhaps seek help from someone else as well? The [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:VisualEditor/VE_as_the_main_editor | existing checklist ]] will be scrutinized at this point. The third phase may be about actually **covering gaps** (especially documentation ones. I don't think we have learning patterns docs about VE, for example, and that's something we may consider creating). **Oct-Dec goal: **The fourth phase should be about **presenting new and/or revisited resources** to communities which should benefit the most from all of this work (the ones without much capacity, which are those I hope to serve with this task). The fifth phase will be about **checking whether people find those resources easier to use now**. It may still be that they don't manage to get much work done, but at least we need to make sure that there's an established path for them, that may be reused/adapted for other products as well.
    • Task
    From T94223: > The [[ http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Citoid | Citoid extension in conjunction with the citoid service]] allows users of [[https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor | VisualEditor]] (a what-you-see-is-what-you-get way of editing wikis) to insert references automatically by inserting a link to a book, journal article, newspaper article, or other identifiers like DOI and PubMed IDs. However, it currently doesn't have the functionality to insert citation templates in wikitext. > > There is at least one on-wiki JavaScript gadgets that already do this, i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Salix_alba/Citoid However, this relies on hard-coded wiki templates and won't work universally on other-language wikis. The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RefToolbar/2.0 | reference toolbar]] suffers from the same problem of requiring hardcoded templates. Per that task's closure, what was done there was adding //"support to reftoolbar as a temporary measure until wikieditor has surface"//. Per James' comment, that represents a valid solution only for a small bunch of wikis.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Copying from one cell and pasting to another, performed several times, gets slower and slower until it eventually leads to the "Unresponsive script" warning. You can test in [[ https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Elitre_%28WMF%29/Sandbox#Test_tabella | my sandbox ]] if you want. I'm getting this in both FF and Chrome.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Expectations: that major sources for which [[https://www.zotero.org/support/translators|Zotero translators exist]] result in detailed information on wiki when the related URLs are pasted in the visual editor. Results: [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox&type=revision&diff=710015754&oldid=705104654 | see here ]]. TL;DR 1 - Adding a ref from the NYTimes results in the following parameters to be filled automatically, URL, TITLE, LAST, FIRST, DATE, LAST2, FIRST2, NEWSPAPER, ISSN, ACCESS-DATE. 2 - From The Economist: URL, TITLE, NEWSPAPER, ISSN, ACCESS-DATE 3 - From Spiegel Online: URL, TITLE, WEBSITE, ACCESS-DATE The first 2 result in a Cite news template, the latter in a Cite web one. Now, the ref generated with the first source looks good - although I'll note that Cite news on en.wiki has almost 100 parameters, so I still expected the ref to be more detailed than it currently is. The second one is a bit meh - it lacks the date (which is available in the article, while authors' names aren't, AFAICT). The third one is probably the most disappointing one, because I can't tell the difference from, say, another random site which does not have a Zotero translator AFAIK (compare with [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox&type=revision&diff=710028061&oldid=710015754|The Mirror]]: actually in this case I even get the authors' names). Just reporting to make sure this is a mere flaw in Zotero's translators.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    See [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_Education_Program/Dashboard/FAQ&veaction=edit&vesection=9 | this page ]] for an example ("Testing the alpha release"). The content for that section comes from a transcluded page. The visual editor recognizes it as a generic template and would allow me to edit it. I guess I can't really ask that edits there get really reflected on the actual page :D , but I wonder if something can be done to represent that content differently to tell the user what's actually going on there.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    1) Write "apple" 2) Try to add an external link to this word 3) Just paste your link into the external link field 4) Observe that your newly created link is a mess, because the word "apple" was showing up as a suggestion in the field, and you were supposed to remove it before pasting the link. This passage feels totally unnecessary, counterintuitive and cumbersome even for cases where the URL is typed rather than pasted.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    In Chrome, Win 8, Vector; I'm trying to change the target for the "language variant" link at the bottom of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor#History . Right after I select the new target, the page scrolls to the top. This doesn't take place if you insert or alter a node (template, comment), apply/unapply a simple annotation (bold), or apply/alter the other rich annotation (language).
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    {F3550237} Alignment is meh. Is this also due to lengthy translations...?
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor/Single_edit_tab#Choosing_your_preferences | Just for OCD sake ]]: the order in which the 4 SET options are given in the VE popup and the order they appear in the Preferences is different (some of the messages are also different, but there's certainly a good reason for that).
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I want to be able to do [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FList_of_Wikipedias%2F2&type=revision&diff=15404715&oldid=15404712 | this ]] in VE.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Support [[ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Gnom/VisualEditor_Appreciation_Society | members of the "VEAppreciation Society" ]] (and other editors at de.wiki) in their efforts to give the visual editor tab to newly registered and anonymous users at their Wikipedia. I've been providing information over the last weeks, [[ https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:Gnom/VisualEditor_Appreciation_Society&diff=prev&oldid=151116914 | suggesting steps to take ]], etc.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Mahitgar reports that many articles at Marathi WP are just empty structures (headings, templates, categories maybe, but little to none actual content - he explains that's done to encourage newbies' editing, but I digress). See [[ https://mr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%87%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%A4_%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%87_%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A8_(%E0%A5%A7%E0%A5%AF%E0%A5%AE%E0%A5%AD_%E0%A4%B9%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%80_%E0%A4%9A%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%9F)&veaction=edit&vesection=3 | example ]]. He expects that putting the cursor right under a heading (when the paragraph is empty) will enable him to start writing, but that doesn't happen. The only way to start a paragraph is pressing Enter when in the heading, which he finds not intuitive at all (he expects that single or double clicks under the heading should also be available as options). Wasn't this the purpose of "slugs"?
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    The apostrophe encoding is ew: "Usa sempre l'editor visuale, se possibile" (the same goes for MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-tabs-prefer-wt/it of course). @Nikerabbit wasn't sure about which dev may fix this. Please do fix the tags if I got'em wrong.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Previously at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128284#2069657 . While logged in, at hu.wiki, I see Edit but clicking on it launches WT, and this is not supposed to happen.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    What the title says. [[ https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Kawiarenka/Kwestie_techniczne#Pojedyncza_zak.C5.82adka_edycji | Update posted today ]]. Community members are busy translating, taking screenshots and announcing this further.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Chrome 48.0.2564.116 m in Win 8. The Disabling VE temporarily option doesn't work. Random page (after choosing that option) only shows the Edit tab; if I try to switch immediately from the button on the toolbar, an empty page will load (only the title is shown), and I can't edit it. Only workaround: doing something minor while in VE, just to prompt the Edit button, //then// hitting the Switch button and //keeping// changes. Other SET options when VE is enabled also don't work; the Remember one won't remember, the 2 tabs don't appear, etc. EDIT: I get weird things in FF as well while logged in, so editing the task accordingly.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    See https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Tabellenf%C3%BChrer_der_Fu%C3%9Fball-Bundesliga?veaction=edit . In Firefox, double click on any cell will cause the page to scroll down; the table options pop-up appears right below the table, and I can't access cell's contents anyway. ([[ https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Sz60cx234el1ajwl&action=compare-post-revisions&topic_newRevision=sz6ov4tnhp8r2602 | Per Diwas ]], current workaround is clicking + pressing Enter).
    • Task
    Oliv0 at hu.wiki reports that he saw the pop-up while switching to WT, however, he didn't pay much attention to its location and dismissed it before reading the bit he needed to see, "You can switch back to visual editing at any time by clicking on this icon.", and hence was clueless as to how to switch editor later. He therefore suggests that the message focuses on the potential action ("this is the icon you need to click to go back to VE"), rather than on the "status update".
    • Task
    {F3406712} I installed [[ https://github.com/tomayac/wikipedia-tools-for-google-spreadsheets#installation | this add-on ]] yesterday and I thought that I'd like to get a similar sidebar in the visual editor showing me documentation and examples, with a drop-down which allows me to select the topic I'm interested in. Having to leave the page to reach the current, extremely long user guide is meh, and also doesn't allow to surface well some of the things the specific community is interested in highlighting.
    • Task
    There are a few things that could be highlighted better at this point: why not VE on talk pages; current sources of informations about what the team is working on and what's next; common issues (at least explanations for nowiki tags); [[ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T130533 | resource for community members ]] who want to make it a perfect tool for their communities.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Type a word, make it a wikilink, or change the target for an existing one. Now try and get out of the "blue area" with your keyboard: you need to hit the Right arrow more than once, and if you forget to add a space before typing again a nowiki tag will be added (of course, this doesn't apply to punctuation). [[ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T71407#1995155 | It has been suggested ]] that the Esc key closes the dialog, but no progress was made in determining whether that should also mean canceling the action or not. Currently, hitting ESC right after choosing a link target doesn't close the link tool - it prompts the "Are you sure?" dialog to leave the page entirely. What about the Tab key instead?
    • Task
    Recently a lot of interface messages related to the visual editor's citing system had to be moved. This meant that user guides on mediawiki.org displayed several red links, and had to be fixed manually. The work in itself isn't difficult, just boring and cumbersome, that is, more worth a bot's time. I don't think a real process for how to change those messages on translatewiki.net without messing up elsewhere exists. [[ https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=User_talk:Raymond&offset=20160222131928&lqt_mustshow=50017#Question!_49994 | Raymond helped me understand ]] how he contributes to such a process. The next step would be finding out whether [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_talk:Replace_Text#Not_here | the extension ]] he uses on translatewiki.net would be a good option elsewhere. Sorry if the tags are random!
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    {F3383142} They're cut at the end. Should affect MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-tabs-prefer-wt/hu, ediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-tabs-prefer-ve/hu, MediaWiki:Visualeditor-editingtabdialog-ok/hu (the third one in the pic is fine). Screenshot is in Firefox, 100% zoom.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    (Seen while testing for T127432, but I had tried it previously on a mobile device as well and the result didn't change). Nothing happens when I click on the "Properties" link for a table (Win8, Chrome and Opera). Works fine on desktop instead.
    • Task
    (Disclaimer, I'm trying this from desktop though.) I can find a way to add a column to [[ https://it.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utente:Elitre_(WMF)/Sandbox&oldid=78955823&veaction=edit#/editor/3 | this table ]], but I can't figure out how to add a row? (Win8, Chrome and Opera.)
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    The joys of having new labels for those interface messages.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    What the title says. Communications began [[ https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia:Kocsmafal_(m%C5%B1szaki)&diff=prev&oldid=17101455#Edit_tabs_announcement | one month ago ]] (no reactions then).
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Pasting http://www.superheromoviesnews.com/2014/02/x-men-producer-lauren-shuler-donner.html in Citoid causes the error message in the title to be displayed [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox&type=revision&diff=705082857&oldid=704232281 | at en.wiki ]]. At the German Wikipedia instead it causes [[ https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzerin:Elitre_(WMF)/sandbox&diff=next&oldid=151527209 | the reference to appear broken ]] (square brackets are shown), both in Citoid's dialog and in the actual page section.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Make [this page](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:VisualEditor) great again!
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Place your cursor somewhere in an article. With a random URL, go to Cite menu, select Manual, then choose Cite web (or its equivalent in other languages, although this seems to affect all the Cite templates). Observe that the newly made reference doesn't appear where you meant to place it, but it's at the beginning of the page instead. [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox&type=revision&diff=704232281&oldid=691404833 | In this example at en.wiki]], it ends up in a heading. Originally reported on the German Wikipedia, user has Safari 9.0.3 / Chrome 47.0.2526 on OS X 10.11.3.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    @czar put us in touch with Sebastian a while ago for a Tech Talk about writing translators for Zotero. Details at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2016-February/084840.html .
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Make sure there are replacements for wikis listed at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98465#1961471 .
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    [ ] All Phase 6 wikis which wouldn't fit in other groups: | arc | Aramaic | Aramaic | | chr | Cherokee | Cherokee | | dv | Dhivehi | Thaana | | got | Gothic | Gothic | | km | Khmer | Khmer | | lo | Lao | Lao | | my | Burmese | Burmese | | tet | Tetum | Latin | | th | Thai | Thai | | tw | Twi | Latin | Note that per T116523, Cherokee was supposed to be part of the "easier" group.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Yesterday I found out a Phase 7 wiki is actually still in the incubator... I'd better review all of them.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    See https://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abou_El_Hassan ([[ https://test2.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abou_El_Hassan&action=edit | tab link ]], clicking on it loads the wikitext editor) . Works as intended instead when VE is the "last editor you used".
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    IPs at test2 wiki enter the visual editor by clicking on View Source from the home page (since that links to https://test2.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=edit ...).
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Steps to reproduce: go to a Wikipedia where the visual editor is still in Beta (I used [[ https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%96%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%83%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0 | hi.wp ]], change interface language if you need to etc.); enable the visual editor from the Beta tab; start a new page (your user page if you don't have one or just follow the Sandbox link at the top, if it's red); access the visual editor. Observe: you need to dismiss a first pop-up, the one which welcomes you to editing; you may get another pop-up which you probably don't really want to see now, which is the "Try Content Translation" one; you can also see yet another pop-up on the background, the one which warns you that you followed a link to a page that doesn't exist etc. It's possible you don't need to actually click on it to dismiss it though; you finally notice the blue dot's animation under the link button. Honestly, it feels like a lot of things one needs to read, close or decide upon before one can actually get to writing - especially since we're planning to add yet another pop-up about the edit tab preferences. (We recently got [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Suspcq0bf5nd3gsd&action=history | similar related feedback ]]). I just wonder whether there's any of this we can show after 1 edits, or 5, etc. Keywords: popup, pop-up, splashscreen, splash-screen, splash screen, banner, warning fatigue, blindness
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Per feedback at mw.org: ManosHacker writes, "References list" is inserted, out of new users' logic or expectation, by a well hidden button, away from "Cite" button. "References list" insertion button could be appearing below "Cite" button, while hovering over it. A tooltip would be much appreciated.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Per feedback at nl.wiki: "parameter is added at the bottom, but on the same line as the }}. We have noticed in the past that if we do not add the }} on a new line for infoboxes (vertical templates), users loose an overview where the infobox ends and the text begins.".
    • Task
    Per feedback on nl.wiki. " [...] it surprised me to see that the software showed a button (+ after clicking a box) for adding a new parameter (in the template dialogue), and I wanted to see if the software gives a warning that the parameter is not defined in the infobox. [...] no warning that parameter is not defined. If this is enabled for everyone, no help is provided, and many new fake parameters are added because of the VE suggesting something strange. They go question themselves why this adding does not work. New users expect with a button "Add more information" that they really can add more information instead of dummy fields that do not work."
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Please enable VE at es. wiki for existing registered users and new registered users, per the outcome of their poll at [[ https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votaciones/2015/Sobre_el_Editor_Visual#Resultado | this page ]] . For new editors, let's go with a gradual rollout, mainly to make the life of patrollers, newbies' helpers etc. a bit easier. (IP editors are not to be included for the moment.) [x] November 3rd: 10% of newly registered users get the VE tab. [x] Nov 10th: raise the threshold to 25% [x] Nov 17th: 50% [x] Nov 24th: 100% [x] Dec 1st: all the logged-in editors get the VE tab.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    "I was adding {{[[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:According_to_whom | According to whom ]]}} to an article and the blurb at the top was exactly like this: {{GENDER:$3|You are adding}} the "$1" template to this page. It doesn't yet have a description, but there might be some information on the <a $2>template's page</a>. So there is something not rendering as designed here. I can supply a screenshot if required. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)"
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    It's not as colorful as the [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabebuia_chrysantha | ipê-amarelo ]] flower. It doesn't taste like [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginjinha | Ginjinha ]]. Then, why do Portuguese-speaking editors like the visual editor so much? [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Editing_department_%E2%80%93_Quarterly_Review_slide_deck,_2016%E2%80%9316_Q1.pdf&page=17 | Its uptake at pt.wiki ]] doesn't seem to have evident reasons, and it's so different from the average value that deserves a little investigation as to why it's so successful there. We may be particularly interested in why IPs prefer it to wikitext editing, but let's not forget that earlier this year [[ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90641#1070461 | we also found out ]] that 27 registered editors there were among the top 500 VE users at the time. Here are a few facts/data points/remarks. * VE has the same config there as on most other big wikis (primary tab, opt-out); * There are not so many templates with TemplateData (around 130, although this includes common Cite templates, Infobox person); * Citoid is enabled, and only provides basic info with //pt// news sites; * There is no local documentation about the product (only a redirect to mediawiki.org's one); * The guides on mw.org are not entirely translated (currently, the user manual basically is - although it's at 76% for //pt-br//; when you look at all the VE-related documentation,// pt// is at 58% and //pt-br// at 75%); * The interface itself is translated almost entirely; * VE is not mentioned or promoted in local help pages (except for a few tutorial pages with less than a dozen views in 90 days each); * VE is not mentioned or promoted in interface messages (i.e., after looking for an article which doesn't exist); * the local feedback page isn't very active and never really hosted conversations around the product (although, let's thank again @He7d3r for all his efforts there); * CLs haven't engaged in a particular way with this community and haven't held specific initiatives; * A couple of instructors involved in Education programs at pt.wp seem to be using it (cc @FloorKoudijs: maybe they're recommending it in class?). Details on these initiatives (and others which may be initiated by community/chapters/user groups etc. like edit-a-thons) are much welcome; * Finally, VE is also much used at pt.books, where it's in opt-out mode (95 out of 500 edits made with it to mainspace pages as of a random check minutes ago); * pt.wiki is "[[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/Editing,_October_2015#VisualEditor | mostly edited from Global South ]], in contrast to earlier concerns the VE would be only usable for GN people with state of the art computers". If we could use T89970 or T104439, we could survey editors directly in a quick and easy way...
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    IT wiki: You can see it [[ https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utente%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox&type=revision&diff=75707174&oldid=75694517 | here ]]. (I also put [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FSandbox&type=revision&diff=685552361&oldid=685551640 | the same citations at en.wiki ]] in case it's useful or interesting for you to see the different outcome.) A solution to a similar issue is discussed in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T97256#1248815 . PL wiki: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Sgikbv81nxsv7oy6&topic_showPostId=sqt0thxnx0gx69xc#flow-post-sqt0thxnx0gx69xc EN wiki: VE is setting the language in {{cite}} templates. It's setting it to en-US, en-GB and other flavours which are not recognized by {{cite}}. Also, these shouldn't be set if the language and wiki are the same languages. On enwiki, these errors end up in [[Category:CS1 maint: Unrecognized language]] CS wiki: Per community discussion [[https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedie:Pod_l%C3%ADpou_(technika)&oldid=14617707#Jazyk_v_cita.C4.8Dn.C3.ADch_.C5.A1ablon.C3.A1ch|here]], spotted also with another problem described in T156548 Examples are: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Harris_(Automotive_Journalist)&action=edit&oldid=688324259 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_Waito&type=revision&diff=685374219&oldid=685373324 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aijia&type=revision&diff=681819929&oldid=681818020
    • Task
    See [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Sqgz631e7i0p2t62 | a related request ]]. (I tried to create a citation with an OCLC number for fun: the system thinks it's a PMID, so I get a result, but not the one I wanted! I used the first one listed in [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:OCLC | Template:OCLC ]], that is, 22239204.) [x] Use pmc [] Use oclc
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I put [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Elitre_(WMF)/Sandbox&diff=next&oldid=684237503 | 2 autonumbered links ]] in my sandbox. I then VEdited the page to add labels using the "new" button in the link dialog. It worked fine with the first one, but when I tried to add it to the second, as soon as I type the first letter the dialog closes, and the link vanishes. I thought it had something to do with the links pointing to Phabricator, for which we have an interwiki shortcut, so I tried with two different URLs, but the result didn't change. (You can test [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Elitre_(WMF)/Sandbox&oldid=684241592 | here ]] if you want.)
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    As seen at [[ https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:Conny/Bilderwunsch&oldid=146529615&veaction=edit | de.wiki ]]. I can reproduce in Safari, I think the editor's browser is Chrome.
    • Task
    [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AVisualEditor%2FFeedback&type=revision&diff=683393103&oldid=683333113 | Kerry gives feedback at en.wiki ]] re: dragging and dropping pictures in articles. Could moving them around be made easier by making it more obvious where the actual code for the image is, or by showing specific spaces (like slugs) where the pic could be dropped in?
    • Task
    Say I want to change the order in which some sources are referenced ([[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Elitre_(WMF)/sandbox&veaction=edit&vesection=1 | like the ones in the Geography section of my sandbox ]]). I'm supposed to simply click on one ref number, drag it and then drop it elsewhere. This works quite smoothly if I drop the ref at the beginning or at the end of the row of references. However, in some browsers (tried in Firefox and Chrome) it is quite difficult to place one ref among others. The cursor turns into a stop sign which seems to suggest that's not allowed at all. (The behavior in Safari confuses me. I don't even understand if I'm actually dragging anything there.)
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    from en.wiki: "When the citation's contents are (only) "[1]", then the contents are invisible in the Re-use dialog and in the context menu. You can see an example at [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fruit_snack&oldid=683228279&veaction=edit | Fruit snack ]], in the third ref (after "General Mills" in the lead). I can reproduce this in Firefox and Safari on Mac OS 10.10. "
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Text editors (like Google Docs) do it by showing a grid that allows people to select as many columns and rows they need. VE currently offers a fixed 4x4 table which may not suit everyone's needs, as per related feedback af de.wiki.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Elitre_(WMF)/Sandbox&oldid=668748978 | In my sandbox ]], there's text with 2 wikilinks to existing articles on en.wiki. One is for the article "Bug". If I try and change the link, the target page is correctly described as "Wikimedia disambiguation page" (although I'm not sure why it would say Wiki//m//edia, but that's not the point). The other one is for the article "[[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leachate | Leachate ]]", which is also described as a disambiguation page, except that's not true.
    • Task
    The feedback tool available from the help menu inside VE is structured so that editors don't have to worry anymore about giving vital details such as the title of the page where an issue has happened, their browser and operating system names. All of this is automatically collected and provided by the tool itself when the feedback is posted. Having access to this information since the very first time a problem is reported is invaluably helpful to those who must triage feedback. No matter how many times and in how many places it is requested to provide such details, most of the times (when feedback is given in free form instead) it will be necessary to follow up by asking the users the basic info to reproduce the issue - and this is not just true for casual feedback givers, unfortunately. The tool just saves everyone time. Let's aim at increasing the percentage of those who know it exists and use it.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    You can see this reported a couple of times in T110597 in September: - "why isn't the link https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit working properly? (Every 1/2 times it doesn't open VE...just odd...)"? - "https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit yet again linked to https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mesitius_szaboi&veaction=edit&redirect=no which didn't open VE. Odd. " This has happened randomly to me as well both in Safari (Mac) and Chrome (Windows 8). I thought it could be related to having several tabs opened with VE sessions in them, but just before filing this, I had none: I just clicked on the URL @Josve05a provided and could reproduce what he said.
    • Task
    A request has been made at de.wp that the special characters panel "remembers", and shows prominently, the last chars an editor has added to articles. I think this had been requested in the past as well, possibly on the mediawiki.org related thread.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    T93800 caused Citoid to be missing from 3 big wikis yesterday. While there has been some progress investigating the issue, I believe that until we find a solution, checking on the 17 wikis which have it enabled should be done at least once daily. I'll try to update this task accordingly, and if one day I can't do it, anybody can actually do that on my behalf: it shouldn't take more than a couple of minutes, after the first time. Useful links ([[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Citoid#cite_note-2 | source for the language codes ]]): # https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit # https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=edit Instructions: - click on each link; - check the "Cite" button in the toolbar, [[ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VisualEditor_citoid_Cite_button.png | it must look like this ]] (the word may appear in local language of course); - now **if it doesn't look like in the pic, and if clicking on it [[ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VisualEditor_-_Editing_References_-_Cite_Pulldown.png | the former Cite pulldown menu ]] appears, rather than [[ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VisualEditor_Citoid_Automatic_tab.png | the current dialog ]], please alert VE people**; -- ping Krinkle, James F. in #mediawiki-visualeditor; -- if you don't get any reply in some minutes, please report the outage at T93800; -- if you still don't hear from anyone after a few mins, feel free to apply the workaround explained at the top of that task. Please report below every time you perform the check. Thanks for your support ;) FYI, James F. finds reasonable checks made after [[ https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deployments | MediaWiki train deployments ]].
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Citoid_support_for_Wikimedia_references#Methods_and_results describes how to get it. See also T96927.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I need this list. I can't generate it myself. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Citoid_support_for_Wikimedia_references#Methods_and_results describes how to get it. See also T96927.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    This option seems to work fine when triggered by the related keyboard shortcut; it is always greyed out for me in the menu when I put the cursor, say, on a wikilink, or select the word by double-clicking on it, while seems to be enabled if I select the entire word by clicking at the beginning or at the end, holding down and then dragging. Ed is looking into it. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89547 and https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101212 may or may not be related.
    • Task
    A [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback&oldid=667958812#Center_justifying_text_in_cells_of_a_table |request]] for the ability to center-justify the text in a tables cells/rows/columns. This is usually done by adding `style="text-align: center;"` to either the entire table, or rows, or cells. Main documentation at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Tables#Attributes_on_tables
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    In Firefox, creating a wikilink on the last word of a line will mean everything you type after that word shows up as blue, as if it was part of the newly-made link. However, this is not really the case, as hitting Enter, Save etc. will make the text look normal again.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    See line 15 of [[ https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boomerang_%28France%29&type=revision&diff=116034881&oldid=115912396 | this diff ]], where a lot of code starting with `...` was added. I inquired about this briefly in the IRC channel and Krenair provided the following evaluation: 16:16 <•Krenair> yeah so the gallery which has the filenames works, the gallery which tries to directly embed the image does not 16:17 <Elitre> so all that  etc mess, how did it end up there? 16:18 <•Krenair> I wonder if that's what happens in some browsers when the user tries to drag an image in directly 16:19 <•Krenair> ultimately the contents of that gallery tag is directly user-controlled 16:19 <•Krenair> so I think valid answers may include 'the user typed it in' or 'the user pasted it in'
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I'm trying to make a link on the word "Europe". First 4 results in the inspector make sense. The 5th result is "Castle". The 6th result is a redirect to "European Castle". I can't see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe_(disambiguation) anywhere (which may be intended because one shouldn't need to link to a disambiguation page so often) and I'm annoyed that I have to type the space, the opening bracket and the letter "d" to make it appear. The advantage of the VE link inspector is that you can right click on the target and open it in another tab to check it. I feel it necessary for me to check that disambig page at this point because of the currently short list of targets. There are at least 8 different pages starting with "Europe" plus a label in brackets. Even if I type "Europe (", I can only see 5 of them. I would need to check the disambig page to know what I actually need to type inside the brackets to finally get to my target.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I'm testing this after a report on de.wiki; the first time I select a word or group of words and then open the link inspector, I'm presented with the list of results for that search. But if I do it again, I'll have to click on the search field instead for results to show up.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I thought the problem was due to [[ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T53689#1303556 | the reference being added to a table ]], but further comments on de.wiki suggest this happens elsewhere when Citoid is used to generate the reference.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    When a user leaves feedback in the related tool in VE, it may not occur to him/her that ticking the User Agent box is what will make the Submit button active. They may think that "File a technical task" is what they need to click on to save their comment, and lose everything they wrote by being sent to Phabricator instead.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    After finding a word with the Search tool, the page loses focus when it's dismissed.
    • Task
    Who's a fan of messages which you can only see once and then you can never go back to them after you dismiss them? (Related to T99963.)
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    ATM, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Visualeditor-dialog-beta-welcome-content and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Visualeditor-beta-warning provide different instructions about how to switch to source editing; the former has the updated information, but once it's dismissed it can't be brought up again. I think that work on this should precede what's planned for T89072.
    • Task
    There are line feed characters in title on pages from this website, which causes template errors. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/presidencia/portavoz/gobierno/114816/susana/diaz/destaca/denominacion/origen/montilla/moriles/sinonimo/riqueza/calidad Remove line feed characters from all fields (maybe except for 'abstract' field?).
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    While VEditing, click on the name of the article to make the toolbar inactive. Notice "Cite" doesn't grey out. Everything is fine instead when the focus is on the template inserter or the Options window.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Following up last weeks' work of [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor/Rollouts | making VisualEditor available at that group ]], it may be useful to follow up at some of those Wikipedias with a table tracking progress with interface and documentation translations ([[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Elitre_(WMF)/Sandbox2 | like this one ]]).
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    Pick an article, add it to your watchlist, now edit it, try to save: notice the //Watch this page// box is unchecked, and as a matter of fact the star isn't blue anymore. Can't reproduce at en.wp.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    When opening https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Primera_B_(Argentina)&veaction=edit&vesection=6 (FF, Chrome, Opera) the section ("Equipos participantes") is totally out of focus. I need to scroll down the page to see it.
    • Task
    • ·Closed
    I'm trying to open https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Primera_B_(Argentina)&veaction=edit&vesection=6 in IE 11, and it just hangs when the bar is almost 2/3 full (I'm not logged in there, if it helps, and trying to edit the entire article instead gives the same result).