@Cparle Thanks, it is okay!

Thank you, @Urbanecm_WMF .
I was thinking when I saw the Special:ManageMentors, if it could display the mentors' status (Active/Away). It will be very helpful to monitor mentor's activities.

thanks @matmarex

Hi @RHo

In T293854#7543212, @RHo wrote:

hi @Dyolf77_WMF - seems like from discussion on this task that changing the wording from "save" to "publish" in the several strings on Growth suggested edits messages is fine. However, I wanted to ask for your input since we originally used "save" due to an assumption that "publish" might be misleading when translated on arwiki (and other wikis with FlaggedRevs) – would changing to "publish" be fine?

Link to a GIF reproducing the bug.

The article is in ar.wiki:
https://ar.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D8%B7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A9_%D9%85%D9%86%D9%8A

Thanks @Urbanecm_WMF

In T290785#7348554, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

On all wikis, "File" and "thumb" will work, but it is better to use the local translations.

Thanks!

Thank you @Urbanecm_WMF

In T284078#7140739, @MMiller_WMF wrote:

@Trizek-WMF @Dyolf77_WMF @Urbanecm_WMF @Ankan_WMF @PPham -- I've gotten some additional feedback that we should shorten the edit summary and remove the counts for rejected and skipped. It would be like: "4 links added via link suggestions feature". What do you think? Or is it important to have the rejected and skipped counts?

It's Ok for me to shorten the summary.

In T281288#7071049, @Etonkovidova wrote:

Checked arwiki betalabs - the issue is fixed.

I tried with another browser (Brave) and I have this:

In T282506#7078682, @MMiller_WMF wrote:

@Dyolf77_WMF -- was this in beta or in production?

Here with another web browser (Firefox)

@MMiller_WMF for you information I tested with 3 different browsers (firefox, chrome and brave on GNU/linux), but it seems that the robot icon is normal if the language was Arabic:

In T281288#7071049, @Etonkovidova wrote:

Checked arwiki betalabs - the issue is fixed.

I will add more 200 images today.
Update: done.

Hi @Etonkovidova, in the pictures you shared, the interface is not in Arabic, I think it is Farsi, so I presume the issue is also in Farsi Wikipedia (maybe all RTL languages)

In T281288#7039225, @kostajh wrote:

@Dyolf77_WMF is the recording from an actual device or from an emulator? @MMiller_WMF & @Etonkovidova filed a similar issue recently, but it seemed to affect only the browser emulator.

Thanks @CBogen

In T273092#7033965, @CBogen wrote:

When you say duplicates, what do you mean? Duplicate articles? Duplicate images? Are you seeing these duplicates after already marking them as good or bad matches?

Thanks, I mean the tool is showing these cases of suggestions:

• the same image with the same article more than once (I marked the image with Okay),
• the same image with different articles (Image marked bad),
• the same article with different image suggestions (Images marked bad/good).

In ar wiki, mentors are watching the list and other mentors activities. If a mentor thinks they are not too active, they remove themself.

@CBogen Hi, I noticed that the tool is displaying many duplicates. And sometimes in image descriptions (in Wikimedia Commons) there are words that match with the article, but the image itself is not at all in the scope of the article.

Done for Arabic.

Unless there is a strong reason to say "AI" in this case, I suggest you consider alternatives. "Machine" can be one. The algorithm behind the feature is not AI (strictly speaking). Even if by some stretch we can consider it an AI, it may not always remain such in future updates to the models. We will remain more accurate and gain more flexibility by using a different term than ML or AI.

Speaking about alternatives, "computer" or "control" are less "sophisticated" than "AI".

For ar.wiki announcement {{ done }}.

Thank you @Urbanecm_WMF !

@Urbanecm_WMF Thanks, I updated the description.

Hi @ppelberg

Questions

• 1. When and how do you think people at your wiki (ar, cs and hu) who have enabled the Discussiontools Beta Feature [i] will expect to be made aware that the New Discussion Tool is available?

1. in my opinion, for ar wiki, while people are adding a new topic, they expect the regular tool(s), but they will notice the new tool during the normal use. It will be an efficient way to be aware of the availability of the NDT. A warning/explaining message could be added to the NDT when it is triggered in the first time.

@matmarex and @ppelberg thank you! That is very interesting to know. I will keep an eye if this often occurs and let you know.
I hope @alaa you have the answer for your question.