"Curate this page" was changed to "Open Page Curation". As far as I know, that link was never displayed on pages unless they were currently in the queue or had recently been in the queue.

Do you really mean "to OOUI", the library, or just as a MediaWiki widget? Are there use cases where adding this heavy functionality is necessary for non-MediaWiki environment tools e.g. things on ToolForge, or is this for use in extensions and gadgets?

Either one is probably fine.

I also belatedly endorse this, as Max's manager's manager :)

@hoo, @Bene, @Eisheeta - Someone still needs to add some real documentation for this extension, i.e. what the heck does it actually do and how do you use it? I'm surprised the extension got deployed without it.

@jayantanth, @Bodhisattwa, @Samwilson - An update: Kannada, Telugu, and Panjabi are now properly supported by the Google Vision API. Malayalam, Oriya, and Gujrati are still broken, however.

@Niharika - This is something that AHT team wants, correct? Huji's already done some work to add the geoip2 library and some related MaxMind components as a dependency to core (which actually dates back to our work on LoginNotify), so we could go ahead and request an initial security review, if this seems like it would be useful to you (for CentralAuth and/or LoginNotify).

@Niharika - This is just a code maintenance issue. No user-facing features would actually be affected by this (although it might make it easier to build such features).

@Huji - Has geoip2 been security reviewed by the WMF yet? I saw that @Reedy had looked over the patch, but not sure if anyone's done a formal security review. If not, let me know if I can help with that.

I'll bring this up with the WMF partner folks.

It looks like this task is done. Please close it and open a new task for any remaining issues, otherwise, it is hard to track the progress of the project. Thanks!

Looks like @Esanders inadvertently broke it while making the code more linter compliant:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/mediawiki/extensions/UploadWizard/+/541298/1/resources/mw.UploadWizardUploadInterface.js

It looks like the placement of the mwe-upwiz-file-texts div in the DOM has changed.

@matthiasmullie @Volker_E - No idea what caused this, but any chance one of you could look into this?

This seems to be caused by the following CSS rule (which I'm assuming is generated by JS):

.mw-kartographer-map .mw-kartographer-fullScreen .oo-ui-iconElement > .oo-ui-buttonElement-button > .oo-ui-iconElement-icon {
    left: 0.35714286em;
}

Which overrides another CSS rule that sets left: 50%;. Disabling the rule above (so that the left: 50%; rule has effect) fixes the button.

I added a new example query at the API:Revisons documentation which shows how to follow redirects. Surprisingly, that wasn't mentioned anywhere on the page before.

@Niharika, @ppelberg - It looks like both the AHT team and the Editing team have marked this bug as external. Does that mean that no one is going to work on it? Just curious, not pushing for this to be prioritized.

After filtering out *wiktionary ns0 and ns1, looks like 917 live pages across all wikis...

@Anomie - Any idea how many pages on Wiktionary would be affected?

It looks like @Tpt is also a maintainer of Phetools, so might be able to help.

I guess its not clear to me what exactly the decision to kill the server side component means. Are we replacing it with a different server side component? If so, how do we know the new component won't suffer from the same concerns that Graphoid has.

No, the idea is that we will no longer have any server-side component dependency. This decision is based on the fact that we don't have engineering capacity to support a dedicated server-side component. It's obviously not ideal, and may have various problems (as mentioned by @Yurik and @Yair_rand), but the alternative would be to retire the Graph extension entirely, which would be worse.

@hashar - Doesn't look like anyone else is interested in leading this session. If you're interested in leading it by yourself, please add your name under "Session Leader(s)" in the description, otherwise, I'm going to have to close it as declined.

Next week: Peter and Marshall meet to talk detail about how best to approach Getting Started and the open questions below.

@ppelberg, @MMiller_WMF - So what were the results of the discussion in August?

@hashar, @Tgr, @kostajh - Feel free to edit the description to incorporate any of these ideas if you feel they are worth discussion. At this point, though, the main thing is that we need someone to put their name under "Session Leader(s)", otherwise the session proposal will be closed on Friday. It sounds like hashar might be tentatively interested, but is looking for someone to help on the technical side of things. Anyone interested in co-leading with hashar?

@Tgr - Perhaps it is pointless.

@srishakatux, @jeropbrenda - Agreed. This seems like a nice addition to T232816. Thank you!

We still don't have an owner identified for this session. If we can't find one by Friday, the session proposal will be closed.

We still don't have an owner identified for this session. If we can't find one by Friday, the session proposal will be closed.

Looks like both the fa_storage_key and fa_sha1 are blank, so no luck :(

@WMDE-leszek - Don't forget to add yourself as the Session Leader above (or ping anyone you think might want to lead this).

@Jrbranaa - Great! Please add yourself as the session leader above and flesh out the description as needed.

@Etonkovidova - That sounds great. I'll change the title and description to focus on the QA aspect. Please add yourself as the session leader above and feel free to add more details to the description (or change it completely).

@Mooeypoo, @Krinkle - We need someone to own this by Friday or it probably won't get approved as an official session.

@WMDE-leszek or @Bmueller - Haven't heard from @RazShuty. Do you know if anyone else at WMDE might be interested in presenting on this topic?

@brion - Any ideas on this or who would be good to ask?

@WMDE-leszek - This seems like a good session idea. Can you format it to match the other session proposals and put yourself as the session leader if you're interested in leading it?

@Jrbranaa @D3r1ck01 - Would either or both of you be interested in leading this session?

@Mooeypoo @WMDE-leszek - Would either or both of you be interested in leading this session?

@Volans, @Etonkovidova - Would either (or both) of you be interested in leading this session?

@RazShuty - Would you be interested in leading this session?

@WMDE-leszek - Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the session description accordingly.

@Nikerabbit @Darenwelsh - You both mentioned 3rd party development and support in your survey responses. Would either (or both) of you be interested in leading this session?

@Mooeypoo @daniel @Krinkle - Any of y'all want to be session leaders or facilitators for this? Feel free to ping other folks as well.